MEASURING CROSS-NATIONAL INVARIANCE OF THE ENTREPRENEURIAL ORIENTATION SCALE

By John D. Hansen, George D. Deitz, M. Tokman, Louis D. Marino, K. Weaver. 2009

140 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fde743ed8e6c0d8d668d48d550564864295997b1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. B. S. Anderson
2. Yoshihiro Eshima
3. V. Story
4. N. Boso
5. J. Cadogan
6. W. Wales
7. G. Lumpkin
8. Aron O'Cass

In Management of Technology and Innovation

1. W. Wales
2. B. S. Anderson
3. Yoshihiro Eshima
4. Robert J. Pidduck
5. Daniel R. Clark
6. G. Lumpkin
7. N. Boso
8. J. Cadogan

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. W. Wales
2. B. S. Anderson
3. Yoshihiro Eshima
4. G. Lumpkin
5. Robert J. Pidduck
6. Daniel R. Clark
7. N. Boso
8. J. Cadogan

Citations in the corpus

• The influence of firm age and intangible resources on the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and firm growth among Japanese SMEs (2013, background): “…a greater breadth of market knowledge in developing their entrepreneurial strategies (Cohen and Levinthal, 1990), such knowledge is heavily path dependent (Henderson, 1999), and likely based on an understanding of market conditions that is growing increasingly outdated (Sørensen and Stuart, 2000).”
• Entrepreneurial mindset: Dispositional beliefs, opportunity beliefs, and entrepreneurial behavior (2021, background): “…be especially important for understanding the contributions made to performance in different global settings and national cultures due to the varied and often unique dynamics surrounding entrepreneurial activity around the world (Hansen et al., 2011; Kreiser & Davis, 2010; Kreiser et al., 2002).”
• The Form of Relationship between Firm-Level Product Innovativeness and New Product Performance in Developed and Emerging Markets (2015, methodology): “Given that coefficient alpha is suggested to understate reliability (Fornell and Larcker, 1981), we assessed reliability by using three indicators of convergent and discriminant validity: composite reliability (CR), average variance extracted (AVE), and highest shared variance (HSV) (Hansen et al., ”
• Entrepreneurial orientation: A review and synthesis of promising research directions (2016, background): “Moreover, Hansen et al. (2011) observed a six-item subset of the Miller/Covin and Slevin (1989) scale to be invariant across countries.”