The influence of firm age and intangible resources on the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and firm growth among Japanese SMEs
By B. S. Anderson, Yoshihiro Eshima. 2013
526 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e925d47c0528dfdf434c4cd317468e5db503075e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Aron O'Cass
- P. Sok
- A. Danso
- Samuel Adomako
- John Ofori Damoah
- B. S. Anderson
- Yoshihiro Eshima
- Vishal K. Gupta
In Management of Technology and Innovation
- P. Sok
- Aron O'Cass
- B. S. Anderson
- Samuel Adomako
- A. Danso
- John Ofori Damoah
- Yoshihiro Eshima
- Vishal K. Gupta
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- P. Sok
- Aron O'Cass
- Samuel Adomako
- A. Danso
- John Ofori Damoah
- B. S. Anderson
- Yoshihiro Eshima
- Vishal K. Gupta
Citations in the corpus
- Balanced scorecard in SMEs: effects on innovation and financial performance (2017, unknown): “organizational culture centres on core values and attitudes, such as the inclination to take risks, experimentation, proactivity towards marketplace opportunities and tolerance of failure (Anderson and Eshima 2013).”
- The Long‐Term Impact of Entrepreneurial Self‐Efficacy and Entrepreneurial Orientation on Venture Performance (2019, background): “But, as Anderson and Eshima (2013) note, organization age is a theoretically meaningful construct and should be explicitly included in EO research.”
- The role of intellectual resources, product innovation capability, reputational resources and marketing capability combinations in firm growth (2014, methodology): “Consequently, a significant level of attention has been devoted to investigating firm growth (Anderson and Eshima, 2013; Wright and Stigliani, 2013). According to Anderson and Eshima (2013), the focus on growth may have significant managerial salience as growing firms generally exhibit better cash f”
- Entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance in Indian SMEs: Universal and contingency perspectives (2016, background): “…revealing high competitive intensity as a specific context under which pursuing an entrepreneurial strategic posture is detrimental to organizational performance, our study contributes to much-needed scholarship on ‘lower limit boundary conditions’ in the EO literature (Anderson and Eshima, 2013).”
- The relationship between innovation, knowledge, and performance in family and non-family firms: an analysis of SMEs (2013, background): “Research on innovation in firms is important as there may be a unique set of processes and resources involved that may help explain innovation as a critical factor in predicting SME performance (Anderson and Eshima 2011; Achtenhagen et al. 2010).”
- The moderating influence of financial literacy on the relationship between access to finance and firm growth in Ghana (2016, methodology): “Following Anderson and Eshima (2013), a three-item, seven-point, subjective performance scale measured firm growth.”
- On Cultural and Macroeconomic Contingencies of the Entrepreneurial Orientation–Performance Relationship (2014, unknown): “This notion is in line with some recent studies that show that the EO-performance relationship depends on the tangible and intangible resources and capabilities of the entrepreneurial firm (Engelen et al., 2013; Anderson & Eshima, 2011).”
- Firm growth, adaptive capability, and entrepreneurial orientation (2017, methodology): “Because our focus is on small to medium-sized businesses, we constrained our sample to firms with between 5 and 250 employees (Anderson and Eshima, 2013).”