Teaching games for understanding in American high-school soccer: a quantitative data analysis using the game performance assessment instrument

142 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A Review of the Game-Based Approaches to Coaching Literature in Competitive Team Sport Settings (2018, methodology): “In contrast, Harvey et al. (2010a) cited a lack of planning by one coach as being problematic in his implementation of TGfU.”
A review of the game-centred approaches to teaching and coaching literature since 2006 (2014, methodology): “Indeed, Oslin and Mitchell highlighted research into numerous performance analysis instruments in their previous review, yet only three studies have, for example, used the GPAI (Harvey et al. 2010; MacPhail, Kirk, and Grifﬁn 2008; Mesquita, Farias, and Hastie 2012).”
Improving ‘at-action’ decision-making in team sports through a holistic coaching approach (2014, methodology): “Significant improvements can be made in off-the-ball and on-the-ball decision-making when using TGfU and similar approaches that emphasize context (Allison & Thorpe, 1997 ; Harvey et al , 2010 ; Gray & Sproule, 2011 ).”
Learning a new method: Teaching Games for Understanding in the coaches’ eyes (2010, background): “In the subsequent two-week period the research team completed baseline game performance assessment sessions (see Harvey et al. 2010).”