Over half of psychology studies fail reproducibility test

By Monya Baker. Nature, 2015

142 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Replication in Second Language Research: Narrative and Systematic Reviews and Recommendations for the Field. (2018, methodology): “…a web infrastructure to facilitate collaboration and has been used for large replication efforts in psychology (e.g., Open Science Collaboration, 2015), which continue to make waves in academia (Laws, 2016; Lindsay, 2015; Martin & Clarke, 2017) and the general media (Baker, 2015; Devlin, 2016).”
Rethinking Reproducibility as a Criterion for Research Quality (2018, result): “…result of the failure of studies aiming to reproduce the results of well-established, published research in the fields of molecular biology (Ioannidis et al 2012), experimental psychology (Open Science Collaboration 2015; Baker 2015) and clinical medicine (Prinz et al 2011; Begley and Ellis 2012).”
Singularity: Scientific containers for mobility of compute (2017, background): “The reproducibility crisis [18–20] in early 2015 made container-based applications especially yearned for by these research communities, for which long term success hinges on the replication of both scientific findings and computational environments.”