Paradox in the periphery: an entrepreneurial reconstruction?

By Alistair R. Anderson. 2000

344 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Sociology and Political Science, Urban Studies, Visual Arts and Performing Arts

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fcd51d5dd25b235686868f5f458a66d663b18de1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Sociology and Political Science

In Urban Studies

In Visual Arts and Performing Arts

Citations in the corpus

University spin-off policies and economic development in Less successful regions: Learning from two decades of policy practice (2005, background): “In seeking to develop knowledge and realise economic potential, these peripheral places face a dual bind; on the one hand, they lack existing potential which implies that current economic activities are less successful than in other places, and on the other hand, when success does emerge, it is remo”
In what sense ‘regional development?’: entrepreneurship, underdevelopment and strong tradition in the periphery (2004, background): “His argument is that ‘gravitation works to strip out higher order functions from the periphery, investing and reinforcing central power’ (Anderson 2000: 94).”
Twenty Years of Rural Entrepreneurship: A Bibliometric Survey (2016, background): “This is often achieved by extracting new value from the traditional and by linking the uniqueness of the local to emergent global values (Anderson, 2000).”
A progress review of entrepreneurship and regional development: What are the remaining gaps? (2016, background): “…as community entrepreneurship (e.g. Johnstone & Lionais, 2004; Peredo & Chrisman, 2006; Somerville &McElwee, 2011), rural entrepreneurship (e.g. Anderson, 2000; Dinis, 2006; Folmer, Dutta, & Oud, 2010; Lafuente, Vaillant, & Rialp, 2007) and returnee and in-migrant entrepreneurship (e.g.…”
Staying Power: What Influences Micro-firm Survival in Tourism? (2013, background): “…such as this one in the far north of Europe have traditionally relied on the primary sector and have been seen as ‘a residuum of leftover core activities’ (Anderson 2000: 93), a view which in recent years has further deepened both the perceived and actual marginality of the region (Eriksson 2010).”
The New Economic Geography of Old Industrial Regions: Universities as Global — Local Pipelines (2007, background): “out higher order functions from the periphery, investing and reinforcing central power’ ( Anderson, 2000, p. 94 ).”
What Kind of Entrepreneurship Drives Regional Development in European Non-core Regions? A Literature Review on Empirical Entrepreneurship Research (2013, background): “305) as “the social structure where a person is embedded in”, also influences regional development in a positive way (Callois & Aubert, 2007; Putnam, 1993; Woodhouse, 2006; Woolcock, 1998).(5) However, there are different interpretations of how this positive influence of social capital comes about (”
Rural entrepreneurship or entrepreneurship in the rural – between place and space (2015, background): “This is in line with Anderson (2000), who suggests the existence of a particular peripheral form of entrepreneurship.”
Creative Outposts: Tourism's Place in Rural Innovation (2012, background): “(Anderson, 2000, p. 93) A significant relationship between the core and the periphery has been the extraction of natural resources from the more rural regions, where space and nature provide the conditions for industries such as agriculture, forestry and mining in order to fuel the economic engine…”
Contextualizing Entrepreneurship—Conceptual Challenges and Ways Forward (2011, background): “For example, studies that research entrepreneurship in local neighborhoods contribute an explicitly socio-cultural perspective which is important in contextualizing entrepreneurship, as it highlights power implications the spatial and social contexts may have for entrepreneurship (Anderson, 2000, p.”
Entrepreneurship Within Urban and Rural Areas: Creative People and Social Networks (2014, background): “The conditional variable: urban and rural areas The concept of urban and rural is intricate because these are social constructs (ANDERSON, 2000).”
Romancing the rural: Reconceptualizing rural entrepreneurship as engagement with context(s) (2018, background): “Secondly, the very idea of genre, typological or categorical uniqueness is difficult to reconcile with the diversity of ways of being entrepreneurial (Anderson and Starnawska, 2008) and the everydayness of much rural enterprising (Welter et al, 2017). An alternative viewpoint, one that we propo”
The best of both worlds: how rural entrepreneurs use placial embeddedness and strategic networks to create opportunities (2015, background): “…in several recent reviews, the role of the spatial context, especially at the localized level, has been much less researched (for exceptions see Anderson 2000; Hjorth 2004; Johnstone and Lionais 2004), and warrants a deeper exploration (Korsgaard, Müller, and Tanvig 2015; Lang, Fink, and…”
A process-based view of social entrepreneurship: From opportunity identification to scaling-up social change in the case of San Patrignano (2010, background): “…an unfulfilled social need and the resulting social innovation are the product not only of the abilities of its founder but also of the embeddedness into a specific environmental and institutional context (Anderson 2000; Jack and Anderson 2002; Johnstone and Lionais 2004; Sundin and Tillmar 2008).”
Rural entrepreneurship in place: an integrated framework (2019, background): “Background literature Entrepreneurial context at the macro-level Entrepreneurship research has taken a contextual turn in recent years by recognising and helping to explain how entrepreneurs are moulded by their milieu (Anderson 2000) and that their actions may also shape features of their environme”
TOURISM EVOLUTION: ON THE SYNERGIES OF TOURISM STUDIES AND EVOLUTIONARY ECONOMIC GEOGRAPHY (2013, background): “From an evolutionary perspective lifestyle entrepreneurs become a special agent of change since they are the actors who introduce new skills and ideas to a locality and who see new value in local assets (Anderson, 2000), and who can thus initiate processes of regional branching by recombining their ”