A progress review of entrepreneurship and regional development: What are the remaining gaps?
By S. Müller. 2016
113 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation, Political Science and International Relations
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/84f7c64c0087d9c0f1dd658fb0362039b14ef8a3
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- David Urbano
- Sebastian Aparicio
- David B. Audretsch
- P. Muñoz
- Jonathan Kimmitt
- Maribel Guerrero
- E. Stam
- Roy Thurik
In Management of Technology and Innovation
- Sebastian Aparicio
- David Urbano
- David B. Audretsch
- P. Muñoz
- Jonathan Kimmitt
- Maribel Guerrero
- F. Liñán
- E. Stam
In Political Science and International Relations
- David Urbano
- Sebastian Aparicio
- P. Muñoz
- Jonathan Kimmitt
- David B. Audretsch
- Roy Thurik
- Maribel Guerrero
- Martin A. Carree
Citations in the corpus
- Twenty-five years of research on institutions, entrepreneurship, and economic growth: what has been learned? (2019, background): “Indeed, Audretsch and Fritsch (2002), Audretsch and Keilbach (2004a, 2004b, 2004c, 2005), Dejardin (2011), González-Pernía and Peña-Legazkue (2015), Müller (2016), and Noseleit (2013) used regional data to find that there is a positive impact of entrepreneurship on regional economic growth.”
- Rural entrepreneurship in place: an integrated framework (2019, background): “Thus, by departing from the current agglomeration foci, we provide an account of the moulding force of a rural entrepreneur’s milieu in a localised and contextualised manner (Müller 2016).”