Winner-Take-All Politics: Public Policy, Political Organization, and the Precipitous Rise of Top Incomes in the United States

By Jacob S. Hacker, P. Pierson. 2010

619 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Finance, Political Science and International Relations

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fcb5f8471f09b6b29fa158b5cdeff8933ebb88eb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Finance

In Political Science and International Relations

Citations in the corpus

Income Inequality and Policy Responsiveness (2015, background): “According to Hacker & Pierson (2010), median voter theory emphasizes “politics-aselectoral-spectacle” rather than the real story involving the influence of wealthy individuals and interest groups.”
Income Inequality and Class Divides in Parental Investments (2018, background): “More specifically, rising income inequality and a building sense of a winner-take-all economy (Hacker and Pierson 2010; Lin 2015) may have heightened anxiety among high-SES parents about their ability to transmit their socioeconomic advantages to their children, which in turn may have led to…”
The One Percent (2014, background): “Because income and wealth concentration are not perfectly correlated with general patterns of inequality over time (Hacker & Pierson 2010) and because there are other excellent reviews available on broader trends in income inequality (Lemieux 2008, McCall & Percheski 2010), I do not provide a…”
Digitalisation of the Economy and its Impact on Labour Markets (2016, background): “…there will also be losers and the split will be between the highly skilled and the low skilled, between the ‘superstars’ (the ‘winner takes all effect’, Hacker and Pierson 2010, also stressed by Ford 2015) and the ordinary people, as well as between capital and labour (Brynjolfsson and McAfee…”
Neoliberalism for the Common Good? Public Value Governance and the Downsizing of Democracy (2014, background): “…list just a few: the growing dominance of corporate interests in “organized political combat” amid the decline of labor unions and civic associations (Hacker and Pierson 2010; Levi 2003; Skocpol 2004); the emergence of an “unequal democracy” based on the rising political importance of money,…”
Financialization and U.S. Income Inequality, 1970–20081 (2011, neutral): “…threats to the U.S. economy, including the first and second oil crises, rising global competition, and stagflation, mobilized business elites to reinvent the relationship between the private sector and the state ðMiller and Tomaskovic-Devey 1983; Useem 1986; Harvey 2005; Hacker and Pierson 2010Þ.”
Structural Power and Bank Bailouts in the United Kingdom and the United States (2014, neutral): “42(4) 427 –454 © 2014 SAGE Publications Reprints and permissions: sagepub.”
The Employment Relationship and Inequality: How and Why Changes in Employment Practices are Reshaping Rewards in Organizations (2013, background): “Hacker and Pierson (2010) document the tremendous increase in resources that corporations have committed to influencing government from the late 1970s onward (see also Baumgartner, Berry, Hojnacki, Kimball, & Leech, 2009; Hula, 1999; Walker, 1991; Werner 2012; Yackee & Yackee, 2006).”
Stochastic Process Methods with an Application to Budgetary Data (2011, background): “For example, recent studies of inequality and the rise of the super-rich (e.g., Piketty and Saz 2003; Hacker and Pierson 2010) focus not on mean changes in income over time but on changes in the dispersion of income and wealth in America.”
Redistribution Under the Right in Latin America: Electoral Competition and Organized Actors in Policymaking (2017, background): “One fundamental reason is that organized actors—a key component of our analytical framework—play a crucial role in policymaking (Hacker & Pierson, 2010; Korpi, 2006).”