Intersectionality in Quantitative Psychological Research

By Nicole Else-Quest, Janet S. Hyde. 2016

339 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fca204b04ac19b2ca031f15e2591a87d08dc05da

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gender Studies

1. S. Shields
2. Leah R. Warner
3. Isis H. Settles
4. Kaitlin McCormick-Huhn
5. Nicole Else-Quest
6. Janet S. Hyde
7. Lakshmi Ramarajan
8. G. Bauer

In Sociology and Political Science

1. S. Shields
2. Leah R. Warner
3. Isis H. Settles
4. Victoria L. Brescoll
5. Gerben A. van Kleef
6. Doan Winkel
7. B. R. Ragins

Citations in the corpus

• What If Psychology Took Intersectionality Seriously? Changing How Psychologists Think About Participants (2019, background): “Other scholars have suggested ways in which engaging with intersectionality could transform psychology (e.g., Bowleg & Bauer, 2016; Cole, 2009; Del Toro & Yoshikawa, 2016; Else-Quest & Hyde, 2016a, 2016b; Marecek, 2016; Rosenthal, 2016; Warner, 2016; Warner, Settles, & Shields, 2016).”
• Gender Differences in Depression in Representative National Samples: Meta-Analyses of Diagnoses and Symptoms (2017, neutral): “The importance of this question is highlighted in intersectionality theory, which emphasizes that all people belong to multiple social categories and that these categories are intertwined (Cole, 2009; Else-Quest & Hyde, 2016a).”