Positive Youth Development and Relational‐Developmental‐Systems

By R. Lerner, J. Lerner, Edmond P. Bowers, G. John Geldhof. 2015

346 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Safety Research, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fbf9b58865ce0aa95b06b72e948c6e8dd1a1c475

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. J. Lerner
2. Steinunn Gestsdottir
3. E. Aardal
4. J. Geldhof
5. T. Larsen
6. I. Holsen
7. G. John Geldhof
8. G. Iraheta

In Safety Research

1. J. Lerner
2. R. Lerner
3. G. John Geldhof
4. Steinunn Gestsdottir
5. Pamela Ebstyne King
6. Elizabeth M. Dowling
7. I. Holsen
8. E. Aardal

In Sociology and Political Science

1. E. Aardal
2. J. Geldhof
3. T. Larsen
4. Pamela Ebstyne King
5. Elizabeth M. Dowling
6. R. Lerner
7. J. Lerner
8. I. Holsen

Citations in the corpus

• The End of the Beginning: Evidence and Absences Studying Positive Youth Development in a Global Context (2018, methodology): “Variation in these constructs moderates trajectories of PYD across the elementary through high school years (Lerner et al. 2015).”
• The five Cs of positive youth development in Norway (2017, background): “The PYD perspective emerged both as a reaction to the deficitoriented models of youth development (Catalano, Berglund, Ryan, Lonczak, & Hawkins, 2004) and as a direct reflection of the relational meta-theories commonly adopted by developmental scientists (Hamilton, 2014; Lerner et al., 2015).”