Understanding Peer Influence in Children and Adolescents.
By Mitchell J. Prinstein, K. Dodge. 2008
381 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fbb351f2ca92a685c1b21c47402e426d0216b8b2
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Social Psychology
- Christina Salmivalli
- E. Poskiparta
- M. Voeten
- Dustin Albert
- Mitchell J. Prinstein
- Laurence Steinberg
- Nicole Heilbron
- Jessica M. Tipsord
Citations in the corpus
- Peer Interactions of Students with Intellectual Disabilities and/or Autism: A Map of the Intervention Literature (2010, background): “Indeed, the quality and quantity of interactions students have with their peers may be among the most influential factors shaping children’s well-being (Prinstein & Dodge, 2008).”
- How Peer Norms of Inclusion and Exclusion Predict Children's Interest in Cross‐Ethnic Friendships (2014, background): “Additionally, extensive research has concentrated on the ways in which peer norms can have detrimental influences on youth (Prinstein & Dodge, 2008), yet peer norms can also exert many positive influences on youth attitudes and behavior (Allen & Antonishak, 2008).”
- Judgment and Decision Making in Adolescence (2011, background): “…and one of the best-documented predictors of adolescents’ risky behavior is the behavior of their peers, a finding that has been attributed to a combination of social learning processes, opportunity effects, and the tendency for risk-takers to seek out similar friends (Prinstein & Dodge, 2008).”
- Bystanders Matter: Associations Between Reinforcing, Defending, and the Frequency of Bullying Behavior in Classrooms (2011, background): “The literature on peer homophily (see Prinstein & Dodge, 2008), for instance, suggests that aggressive children and adolescents tend to select each other as friends (e.g., Haselager, Hartup, van Lieshout, & Riksen-Walraven, 1998) but also influence each other’s subsequent antisocial behaviors…”
- Peer influence and adolescent nonsuicidal self-injury: A theoretical review of mechanisms and moderators (2008, background): “Recent theories have suggested that perhaps many past findngs identifying specific target-oriented constructs converge on a entral factor reflecting adolescents’ general uncertainty regarding heir self-concept or social identity (Prinstein & Dodge, 2008).”
- Participant Roles in Bullying: How Can Peer Bystanders Be Utilized in Interventions? (2014, background): “The second mechanism that prevents people from expressing antibullying attitudes in public has been referred to as “pluralistic ignorance” (Juvonen & Galvan, 2008, pp. 233–234).”
- Peer Contagion in Child and Adolescent Social and Emotional Development (2011, background): “Allen & Antonishak (2008) suggest that peer influence is inevitable and thus, to reduce deviant peer influence, society must promote nondeviant values and strengthen youths' positive connections to peers and adults.”