A meta-validation model for assessing the score-validity of student teaching evaluations

124 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Student evaluations of teaching: combining the meta-analyses and demonstrating further evidence for effective use (2012, background): “However, Onwuegbuzie, Daniel, and Collins ( 2009 , 206) concluded with ‘serious doubt on the score validity of STEs [ sic ], particularly in terms of areas of content‐related validity and construct‐related validity’, and Pounder ( 2007 ) echoed these concerns over the utility and validity of SETs.”
Guidelines for Conducting and Reporting Mixed Research in the Field of Counseling and beyond. (2010, methodology): “…for the quantitative component of the mixed research at the data collection, data analysis, and data interpretation steps of the study, as well as the measurement models of Messick (1989, 1995) and Onwuegbuzie, Daniel, and Collins (2009) for assessing the psychometric properties of instruments.”
On the Validity of Student Evaluation of Teaching (2013, methodology): “The purpose of this article is to provide a systematic overview of the recent literature on SET (since 2000) using the meta-validity model for assessing the score validity of SET designed by Onwuegbuzie et al. (2009). Through this validity lens, we consider both the more traditional research themes ”
Mixed Research as a Tool for Developing Quantitative Instruments (2010, background): “Onwuegbuzie, Daniel, and Collins (2009) have provided a useful framework that can be used both to develop and assess the fidelity of quantitative instruments.”