Dyadic Communication Relationships in Organizations: An Attribution/Expectancy Approach

By B. Barry, bullet J Michael Crant. 2000

172 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fb3162ff2c38bcda05ed9837d547346bbde4282d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Negotiating Relationally: The Dynamics of the Relational Self in Negotiations (2006, unknown): “Similar to the negotiation literature, the OB literature has been criticized as having an arelational focus (Fletcher & Jacques, 1999; see also Barry & Crant, 2000, and Bradbury & Bergmann, 2000).”
From bad to worse (2012, background): “Research on dyadic communication in organizations has found that exchange partners may have either a more instrumental or more expressive approach to communicating with each other, with interaction patterns often changing from the former to the latter as relationships grow (Barry & Crant, 2000).”
Relational Job Design and the Motivation to Make a Prosocial Difference (2007, background): “…body of research suggests that interpersonal relationships play a key role in enabling employees to experience their work as important and meaningful (Barry & Crant, 2000; Bradbury & Lichtenstein, 2000; Gersick, Bartunek, & Dutton, 2000; Kahn, 1990, 1998; Wrzesniewski, Dutton, & Debebe, 2003).”
How Effective Is Telecommuting? Assessing the Status of Our Scientific Findings (2015, background): “Frequent face-to-face interaction is thought to facilitate the development of such relationships (Barry & Crant, 2000).”
Relational Leadership Theory: Exploring the social processes of leadership and organizing (2006, background): “A combined approach would take a static model like that of Uhl-Bien et al. (2000) (see Figure 1 in their article) or Barry & Crant (2000) and “bring it to life” by operationalizing it with a richer methodology than using only surveys (and would examine broader relationships than just the…”