Delinquent Peers Revisited: Does Network Structure Matter?1

By Dana L. Haynie. American Journal of Sociology, 2001

1,077 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fac49077a097b8a170888132a4af7687e527e9ea

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Evidence of Negligible Parenting Influences on Self‐Control, Delinquent Peers, and Delinquency in a Sample of Twins (2008, methodology): “Measures of delinquent peers have been found to be predictive of a wide range of antisocial behaviors across different samples, across different time periods, and using different analytical strategies (Akers, 1998; Haynie, 2001, 2002; Matsueda & Anderson, 1998; Warr, 1996, 2002).”
Can Cultural Worldviews Influence Network Composition? (2010, background): “…are many cross-sectional studies that infer influence on the basis of positive associations between alter’s and ego’s attitudes and orientations (see Haynie 2001 for a recent example), the bulk of them do not properly consider that ego and alter may have already displayed substantial cultural…”
Modeling the Coevolution of Networks and Behavior (2007, background): “For some time, researchers have been contemplating the question whether selection processes or processes of social influence play a stronger role in the explanation of particular network autocorrelation phenomena (Fisher and Bauman, 1988, Ennett and Bauman, 1994, Leenders, 1995b, Pearson and Michell”
The Empirical Status of Social Learning Theory: A Meta‐Analysis (2010, background): “Second, scholars have recently challenged the validity of using indirect measures of peers’ deviant behaviors as an indicator of differential association (see, e.g., Haynie, 2001, 2002).”
How Do They ‘End Up Together’? A Social Network Analysis of Self-Control, Homophily, and Adolescent Relationships (2011, neutral): “Although there is a growing consensus that the effect of peer delinquency in past studies was overestimated (e.g., Haynie 2001, 2002; Haynie and Osgood 2005; Weerman and Smeenk 2005), subsequent research, using more accurate measures of peer delinquency, continues to find that the introduction of ”
Effects of Classroom Embeddedness and Density on the Social Status of Aggressive and Victimized Children (2010, methodology): “It is possible that density itself does not yield positive or negative outcomes but instead interacts with other aspects of network structure and group norms (Haynie, 2001).”
Beyond dyadic interdependence: Actor-oriented models for co-evolving social networks and individual behaviors (2007, background): “Previous research suggests that adolescents are similar to their friends on delinquent behaviors and incorporate their friends’ delinquent behaviors over time (Dishion & Dodge, 2005; Haynie, 2001; Ploeger, 1997; Snijders & Baerveldt, 2003; Vitaro, Trembley, Kerr, Pagani, & Bukowski, 1997).”
Identifying Peer Effects in Student Academic Achievement by Spatial Autoregressive Models with Group Unobservables (2010, background): “This is consistent with several studies, including Haynie (2001) and Vaquera and Kao (2008), which find that friendships are not always reciprocal and that reciprocated friendships, unlike the nonreciprocated ones, are likely to be more intimate and important.”
Is It Who You Know, or How Many That Counts? Criminal Networks and Cost Avoidance in a Sample of Young Offenders (2010, background): “E-mail: mbouchard@sfu.ca examined the role of delinquent peers in explaining involvement in crime (e.g., Haynie, 2001, 2002; Matsueda & Anderson, 1998; Payne & Cornwell, 2007; Sutherland, 1947; Warr, 2002).”
Reconsidering Peer Influences on Delinquency: Do Less Proximate Contacts Matter? (2007, methodology): “This finding squares with prior tests of differential association theory which use the delinquency of one's best or closest friends as the primary measure of peer influence (Akers et al. 1979; Haynie 2001; Jensen 1972; Matsueda and Heimer 1987; Warr and Stafford 1991).”
Peers and delinquency among girls and boys: Are sex differences in delinquency explained by peer factors? (2012, background): “Recently, the use of social network data among youths has provided new insights into the relationship between peers and delinquency (Haynie, 2001; Weerman and Bijleveld, 2007).”
The Power of Place: Immigrant Communities and Adolescent Violence (2009, methodology): “Following previous research that has used the Add Health data to study delinquent behavior (Haynie 2001; Bellair, Roscigno, and McNulty 2003), each item was converted to a dichotomous variable in order to create an index (1 = adolescent had engaged in the behavior or 0 = adolescent had not engaged…”
Peer Influence and Delinquency (2019, background): “Numerous studies have since used these objective peer measures in their models, revealing an enduring relationship between peer deviance and delinquency (e.g., Haynie 2001, 2002; McGloin 2009; Weerman & Smeenk 2005).”