Content and thematic analysis

By H. Joffe, Lucy Yardley. 2003

1,397 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management Science and Operations Research, Speech and Hearing

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fab4a05a66bc1ad82851925ff169bbaf0ca2aa05

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Science and Operations Research

In Speech and Hearing

Citations in the corpus

Video summarisation: A conceptual framework and survey of the state of the art (2008, methodology): “In-depth descriptions of the process are available in [11–14].”
Teaching thematic analysis: Overcoming challenges and developing strategies for effective learning (2013, background): “Since first being named as an approach in the 1970s (Merton, 1975), a number of different versions of thematic analysis have been proposed within psychology (e.g., Aronson, 1994, Attride-Stirling, 2001, Boyatzis, 1998, Joffe & Yardley, 2004, Tuckett, 2005), including our own (Braun & Clarke, 2006).”
Factors affecting the utilization of antenatal care in developing countries: systematic review of the literature. (2008, methodology): “Both content and thematic analyses were conducted ( Joffe & Yardley 2004 ) , relationships between the different themes were then identified and grouped into the broad overall themes discussed below ( Forrest Keenan et al .”
… Not drowning, waving. Resilience and university: a student perspective (2018, methodology): “Quantitative content analysis (Joffe and Yardley 2004) was applied to the data to identify the frequency of the emergent themes.”
A longitudinal content analysis of gender role portrayal in Belgian television advertising (2016, result): “Developing coding categories through such a process facilitates comparison with existing studies (Joffe and Yardley 2004; Luyt 2011).”
Free Association in Psychology and the Grid Elaboration Method (2014, background): “This facilitates the detailed analysis of the content (see Joffe, 2012; Joffe & Yardley, 2004).”
Pets in danger: exploring the link between domestic violence and animal abuse (2017, background): “The limitations of attempting to quantify qualitative data have been discussed elsewhere (see Basit, 2003; Loffe & Yardley, 2004; Vaismoradi et al., 2013).”
Intercoder Reliability in Qualitative Research: Debates and Practical Guidelines (2020, methodology): “The result is a more explicit and well-defined coding frame (Joffe & Yardley, 2003), which is the primary tool for analyzing the data.”