Brain potentials of recollection and familiarity

By Tim Curran. Memory & Cognition, 2000

726 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fa7818bdd14fe0e3cecbdc1f3ccb60e2bdca1c8b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Event‐related potential (ERP) studies of memory encoding and retrieval: A selective review (2000, methodology): “This conclusion has been supported by Curran (2000), who conducted an experiment based on Hintzman and Curran’s (1994) plurality recognition procedure.”
The Picture Superiority Effect in Recognition Memory: a developmental study (2009, background): “Furthermore, the use of event-related brain potentials (ERPs) in the study of recognition memory has revealed an early ERP component, at about 300–500 ms, associated with familiarity, and a later component, at about 400–800 ms, associated with recollection (Curran, 2000; Rugg & Curran, 2007).”
Recognition memory for one-trial-unitized word pairs: Evidence from event-related potentials (2010, neutral): “j o u r n a l h o m e p a g e : w w w. e l s e v i e r. c o m / l o c a t e / y n i m g between 400 and 800 ms (Rugg et al., 1998; Curran, 2000; Jäger et al., 2006; Mecklinger, 2000; Woodruff et al., 2006; however, the exact functional meaning of the early mid-frontal old/new effect is still under…”
Mind at ease puts a smile on the face: psychophysiological evidence that processing facilitation elicits positive affect. (2001, result): “These computer simulations are consistent with human studies showing that stimulus familiarity can be detected faster than stimulus identity, as reflected in judgments and evoked potentials ( Curran, 2000 ; Hintzman & Curran, 1994 ).”
Modeling hippocampal and neocortical contributions to recognition memory: a complementary-learning-systems approach. (2003, background): “In the combined model, variability in how well items are learned at study (encoding variability) bolsters the correlation between recall and familiarity signals, as was postulated by Curran and Hintzman (1995) and others.”
Recognition memory: What are the roles of the perirhinal cortex and hippocampus? (2001, result): “Similar distinctions between a recollective parietal (P600) effect at 400–800 ms and an earlier frontal (FN400) effect at 300–500 ms thought to reflect familiarity have since been made in studies using different types of stimulus to distinguish these forms of respons”
Autobiographically Significant Concepts: More Episodic than Semantic in Nature? An Electrophysiological Investigation of Overlapping Types of Memory (2015, background): “For instance, the FN400 responds similarly to studied items and perceptually similar lures (Curran & Cleary, 2003; Curran, 2000).”
Processing Fluency and Aesthetic Pleasure: Is Beauty in the Perceiver's Processing Experience? (2004, background): “Curran, T. (2000). Brain potentials of recollection and familiarity.”
The Nature of Recollection and Familiarity: A Review of 30 Years of Research (2002, background): “…and spatial scalp distrib tions from those related to items that are reco nized on the basis of familiarity in the absen of recollection (e.g., Curran, 2000; Düze Yonelinas, Mangun, Heinze, & Tulving, 1997 Smith, 1993; Klimesch, Doppelmayr, Yonel nas, Kroll, Lazzara, Rohm, & Gruber, 2001…”
A dual-process account of the list-length and strength-based mirror effects in recognition (2003, background): “There is converging evidence in support of a dual-process theory of recognition memory (for a review see Yonelinas, 2002), including evidence from event-related potentials (e.g., Curran, 2000 ) and chemically induced temporary amnesia (Hirshman, Fisher, Henthorn, Arndt, & Passannante, 2002).”
The face of fluency: Semantic coherence automatically elicits a specific pattern of facial muscle reactions (2009, background): “Since we know that low fluency serves as an early indicator for stimulus novelty (Curran, 2000; Reber et al., 2004) and high fluency triggers (even false) feelings of familiarity of a stimulus (Whittlesea, 1993), frontalis activity may be linked to low states of processing fluency.”
EEG oscillations and recognition memory: Theta correlates of memory retrieval and decision making (2006, result): “Consistent with this interpretation, the oscillatory correlates of TLC and TL have time courses similar to observed ERP correlates of familiarity and recollection (Curran, 2000).”