The Nature of Recollection and Familiarity: A Review of 30 Years of Research
By Andrew P. Yonelinas. 2002
3,876 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c46b21813a6ab55d9376dab4ec436db3ecb6cb44
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- John T. Wixted
- Charan Ranganath
- Daniel L. Schacter
- Roberto Cabeza
- Cheryl L. Grady
- Donna Rose Addis
- Morris Moscovitch
- Marcia K. Johnson
In Social Psychology
- John T. Wixted
- Constantine Sedikides
- Karen J. Mitchell
- Marcia K. Johnson
- David M. Amodio
- Elizabeth A. Kensinger
- Andrew P. Yonelinas
- Kenneth A. Norman
Citations in the corpus
- E-Z Reader: A cognitive-control, serial-attention model of eye-movement behavior during reading (2006, result): “L2 distinction is consistent with the distinction in the memory literature between a rapidly available recognition process and a slower retrieval process (Atkinson & Juola, 1973, 1974; Yonelinas, 2002).”
- Memory for own- and other-race faces: A dual-process approach (2005, methodology): “The current investigation seeks to inform this debate by framing the CRE within the constraints of a dual-process theory of memory (Gardiner & Richardson-Klavehn, 2000; Kelley & Jacoby, 2000; Mandler, 1980; for a review see Yonelinas, 2002).”
- Prior Exposure Increases Perceived Accuracy of Fake News (2018, positive): “These findings indicate that our repetition effect was likely driven, at least in part, by automatic (as opposed to strategic) memory retrieval (Diana, Yonelinas, & Ranganath, 2007; Yonelinas, 2002; Yonelinas & Jacoby, 2012).”
- Mnemic neglect: Selective amnesia of one’s faults (2016, background): “…assessment does not require the elaborate traversal of associative pathways formed during feedback processing (Diana, Reder, Arndt, & Park, 2006; Yonelinas, 2002) and is sensitive to the presence of material in memory that is difficult to recall (Shiffrin & Steyvers, 1997; Stangor & McMillan,…”
- Recognition memory for one-trial-unitized word pairs: Evidence from event-related potentials (2010, neutral): “Notably, inferences on familiarity and recollection drawn from ROC analyses need to be treated with some caution as the conclusions critically depend on whether single or dual process models are applied to fit the data (Yonelinas, 2002).”
- Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English (2009, background): “At the same time, high-frequency words are easier to recall but more difficult to recognize in episodic memory tasks (e.g., Glanzer & Bowles, 1976; Yonelinas, 2002).”
- Improving memory in older adults: Training recollection (2003, background): “Previous research examining recollection has viewed it as a process that entails the conscious retrieval of one or more specific details from a prior learning event (e.g., Jacoby et al., 1993, 1996, 1997; Yonelinas, 2002).”
- The medial temporal lobe and memory (2007, background): “This second view builds on dual-process models of recognition memory that propose that recognition decisions can be based on two forms of memory (Mandler, 1980), (a) assessments of stimulus familiarity and/or (b) recollection of specific details surrounding an item's prior encounter, such as recolle”
- Brain Networks Underlying Episodic Memory Retrieval (2012, neutral): “The majority of the reviewed studies took as their starting point a ‘dual-process’ model of memory [2,3].”
- Differential effects of age on item and associative measures of memory: a meta-analysis. (2008, background): “Given that aging appears to disrupt recollection but leaves familiarity relatively intact (e.g., Yonelinas, 2002), possibly because of the high demand of self-initiated processing (see Craik, 1986) by recollection, this account predicts a large Th is d oc um en t i s c op yr ig ht ed b y th e A m…”
- Output interference in recognition memory (2011, background): “…memory trace is recalled and when that trace matches the probe well enough this is sufficient to produce a positive recognition decision (e.g. Atkinson & Juola, 1974; Malmberg, 2008; Malmberg, Holden, & Shiffrin, 2004; Mandler, 1980; Xu & Malmberg, 2007; see Yonelinas, 2002 for a review).”
- Reducing false recognition with criterial recollection tests: Distinctiveness heuristic versus criterion shifts (2004, methodology): “According to some dual process theories, though, it is possible that repetition may have increased recollection more than familiarity (e.g., Jacoby, 1999; Yonelinas, 2002).”