Honesty on the Streets. A Field Study on Newspaper Purchasing

152 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Why Do We Lie? A Practical Guide To The Dishonesty Literature (2018, background): “In the second natural field study, Pruckner and Sausgruber (2013) tested whether different moral reminders at newspaper stands would result in more people paying for the newspapers they take.”
Norm Perception as a Vehicle for Social Change (2016, background): “For these individuals, positive evaluations (smiley faces) accompanied their feedback, encouraging them to continue using less than the norm (see also Pruckner & Sausgruber, 2013).”
TESTING ENFORCEMENT STRATEGIES IN THE FIELD: THREAT, MORAL APPEAL AND SOCIAL INFORMATION (2013, background): “Mazar, Amir, and Ariely (2008) and Pruckner and Sausgruber (2013), for instance, find that normative messages are effective in preventing people from cheating.”
Gender Differences in Honesty: Groups Versus Individuals (2015, background): “On the other hand, there is evidence that ‘‘moral reminders’’ reduce dishonesty (Pruckner and Sausgruber, 2013).”
Let’s be honest: A review of experimental evidence of honesty and truth-telling (2014, background): “Similarly, in honor stands, it is typically a for-profit firm such as newspaper (Pruckner and Sausgruber, 2013) or confectionary manufacturer (Haan & Kooreman, 2002), while the victim in self-reported outcomes and theft tasks is typically an unfamiliar experimenter.”