Are OECD-prescribed “good corporate governance practices” really good in an emerging economy?
By Victor Zitian Chen, Jing Li, Daniel M. Shapiro. 2011
215 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f9ccfdb7848c20018c5113fa7c1702043b2def21
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
In Strategy and Management
- Yi Jiang
- Marc van Essen
- Mike W. Peng
- Daniel M. Shapiro
- Jing Li
- P. Duran
- M. Carney
- Victor Zitian Chen
Citations in the corpus
- Are family ownership and control in large firms good, bad, or irrelevant? (2011, background): “In conclusion, a uniform set of restructuring initiatives may not be appropriate in different institutions across Asian countries ( Chen, Li, & Shapiro, 2011 ).”
- Ownership of Corporations (2016, background): “Similarly, scholars should pay attention to the quality of the endogeneity controls as differences have emerged between using two-stage least squares (2SLS) variables and one-year lagged DVs (e.g., Chen et al., 2011; Inoue et al., 2013), allowing the first to claim more solid findings.”
- Ownership structure and innovation: An emerging market perspective (2013, background): “For instance, they can use firm resources to build their own pyramidal business groups that direct resources towards complex relational trading at the expense of innovation (Chen et al., 2011).”
- Corporate boards and the performance of Asian firms: A meta-analysis (2012, background): “…into Asian corporate governance in the last decade is in part driven by the recognition that many of the key assumptions and good governance prescriptions arising from the agency theoretical view of boards do not hold in the Asian context (Chen et al., 2011; Globerman, Peng, & Shapiro, 2011).”
- Corporate Governance in China: A Meta‐Analysis (2018, background): “…outside directors, separating the positions of board chair and chief executive officer (CEO), and providing executive compensation packages that include contingent forms of pay – underpinned by what are generally viewed as ‘good’ or standard corporate governance principles (Chen et al., 2011b).”