Invasive plants versus their new and old neighbors: a mechanism for exotic invasion.

By R. Callaway, Erik T. Aschehoug. Science, 2000

1,505 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f9c7c7605b470e536ba1a22734c38ab3b08fb72c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Insect Science

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

The invasive shrub European buckthorn (Rhamnus cathartica, L.) alters soil properties in Midwestern U.S. woodlands (2006, background): “Invaders have been implicated in reducing native biodiversity by means of altering interspecies interactions (Callaway and Aschehoug, 2000; Sanders et al., 2003) and/or through modifying ecosystem properties (Vitousek et al.”
An invasive aster (Ageratina adenophora) invades and dominates forest understories in China: altered soil microbial communities facilitate the invader and inhibit natives (2007, background): “1997; Bever 2002, 2003), they do not preclude the importance of other factors, for example soil nutrition and litter dynamics and the production of allelopathic compounds (Vaughn and Berhow 1999; Callaway and Aschehoug 2000; Suding et al. 2004; Vivanco et al. 2004) which can also affect plant–soil b”
BIODIVERSITY, INVASION RESISTANCE, AND MARINE ECOSYSTEM FUNCTION: RECONCILING PATTERN AND PROCESS (2002, background): “Similarly, some terrestrial plants appear more susceptible to competitive effects from species in their native range than in areas to which they are introduced (Callaway and Aschehoug 2000).”
A unifying framework for biological invasions: the state factor model (2008, background): “BRH Biotic Resistance Hypothesis DH Disturbance Hypothesis EICA Evolution of Increased Competitive Ability Hypothesis ERH Enemy Release Hypothesis FRH Fluctuating Resource Hypothesis NWH Novel Weapons Hypothesis PP Propagule Pressure J. N. Barney T. H. Whitlow Department of Horticulture, Cornell Uni”
Comparison of the Allelopathic Potential of Leguminous Summer Cover Crops: Cowpea, Sunn Hemp, and Velvetbean (2007, methodology): “Smooth amaranth was tested with and without 3% activated carbon (Callaway and Aschehoug, 2000).”
Enhanced allelopathy and competitive ability of invasive plant Solidago canadensis in its introduced range (2013, background): “invasive plant species (Elton 1958; Blossey and Nötzold 1995; Callaway and Aschehoug 2000; Stockwell et al.”
Field‐based competitive impacts between invaders and natives at varying resource supply (2008, background): “Thus, although knapweed is allelopathic (Callaway & Aschehoug 2000; Bais et al. 2003), this does not in relation to the other two exotic species, appear to boost its per capita competitive impacts on natives.”
Biogeographical variation in community response to root allelochemistry: novel weapons and exotic invasion (2004, background): “(spotted knapweed), has been demonstrated to engage in allelopathy at the rhizosphere level, which most likely contributes to the invasiveness of this knapweed ( Callaway & Aschehoug 2000; Bais et al. 2002).”
Novel chemical weapon of an exotic macroalga inhibits recruitment of native competitors in the invaded range (2013, background): “One well-known example, which gave rise to the NWH, is the diffuse knapweed Centaurea diffusa, which through its root-exuded phytotoxins can achieve competitive dominance over plants native to North America (Callaway & Aschehoug 2000; Vivanco et al. 2004).”
Do allelopathic compounds in invasive Solidago canadensis s.l. restrain the native European flora? (2008, background): “These non-coevolved competitors may be more susceptible to novel phytochemicals than adapted competitors in the native range (novel weapons hypothesis; Callaway & Aschehoug 2000).”
Herbivory, time since introduction and the invasiveness of exotic plants (2005, background): “…plants experiencing little herbivory in our study may be particularly well defended with chemicals that are novel to North American herbivores, much as Callaway & Aschehoug (2000) and Vivanco et al. (2004) hypothesize that some plants become invasive by virtue of their novel allelopathic ‘weapons’.”
Community ecology theory as a framework for biological invasions (2002, background): “Species in different systems might vary in competitive ability [11, 26 ] or their degree of specialization [29] – that is, the breadth of conditions under which individual members have positive responses to their environment.”
High competitiveness of a resource demanding invasive acacia under low resource supply (2009, background): “Hence, this adds another example indicating that the success of invasive species can originate from a lack of stress adaptations and different resource use strategies, which may disrupt co-evolved interactions of the native plant community (Callaway and Aschehoug 2000).”
Differences in morphological and physiological traits between native and invasive populations of Sapium sebiferum (2007, background): “…evolution in the native range before its introduction or new adaptation as a result of an evolutionary response to escape from natural enemies in the introduced range (Blossey & Nötzold 1995; Callaway & Aschehoug 2000; Leger & Rice 2003; Erfmeier & Bruelheide 2005; Güsewell, Jakobs & Weber 2006).”
Plant-soil feedbacks: a meta-analytical review. (2008, background): “More specifically, soils in introduced habitats are expected to be relatively enemy-free and symbiont-rich, because root herbivores and pathogens have not co-evolved to specialize on non-native plant species, while common symbionts are generalists (Callaway & Aschehoug 2000).”
Low allelochemical concentrations detected in garlic mustard-invaded forest soils inhibit fungal growth and AMF spore germination (2011, background): “These allelochemicals have been implicated in the success of several plant invaders (Hierro and Callaway 2003); however, most empirical support of the novel weapons hypothesis comes from experiments conducted in controlled environments (Callaway and Aschehoug 2000; Prati and Bossdorf 2004; Orr et al”