Herbivory, time since introduction and the invasiveness of exotic plants

By David J Carpenter, N. Cappuccino. 2005

182 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/578891aa6a35f6d47d6cba8994f4e105a3d4a886

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Insect Science

In Plant Science

Citations in the corpus

Identifying the most noxious invasive plants in China: role of geographical origin, life form and means of introduction (2009, background): “We assumed that times being studied could reflect an invader’s impacts (Mitchell and Power 2003; Carpenter and Cappuccino 2005), and if a invader was not studied at all, it was probably less noxious or its negative impacts had not been well recognized.”
Biotic interactions and plant invasions. (2006, background): “…as such, demographic success 1Department of Biology and Curriculum in Ecology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3280, USA 2Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA 3Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN”
Root exudate is allelopathic in invaded community but not in native community: field evidence for the novel weapons hypothesis (2009, background): “The novel weapons hypothesis posits that unique biochemical constituents of invasive species may contribute to their success (Rabotnov 1982; Callaway & Aschehoug 2000; Mallik & Pellissier 2000; Bais et al . 2003; Vivanco et al . 2004; Cappuccino & Carpenter 2005; Carpenter & Cappuccino 2005; Calla”
Tolerance to herbivory, and not resistance, may explain differential success of invasive, naturalized, and native North American temperate vines (2007, background): “Depending on the species and experiment, researchers have observed that invasive species suffer lower, higher, or similar damage rates compared to natives (Daehler, 2003; Levine et al ., 2004; Carpenter & Cappuccino, 2005; Parker et al ., 2006).”
Impacts of Invasive Species on Food Webs: A Review of Empirical Data (2017, background): “…local competitors because they are not controlled by the enemies that used to keep them in check in their area of origin; and because the native enemies in the area of introduction have lower impact on them than on competing local species (Carpenter and Cappuccino, 2005; Parker and Gilbert, 2007).”
Biodiversity, exotic plant species, and herbivory: The good, the bad, and the ungulate (2007, background): “Carpenter and Cappuccino (2005) agreed that successful, highly aggressive exotic plant invaders often exhibit resistance to herbivory, which may indicate that such plants contain potent defense chemicals novel to North America.”
Reduced plant–soil feedback of plant species expanding their range as compared to natives (2007, unknown): “2005; Carpenter & Cappuccino 2005).”
A unifying framework for biological invasions: the state factor model (2008, background): “Therefore, properties of the invasion (i) are strongly dependent on the current stage of the invasion (t), which is almost never documented (though see Carpenter and Cappuccino 2005).”
Novel chemical weapon of an exotic macroalga inhibits recruitment of native competitors in the invaded range (2013, methodology): “Hence, such a straightforward tool may aid management decisions in preventing the global spread of invasive exotics before the species become established in the new range (Carpenter & Cappuccino 2005).”
Season and severity of prescribed burn in ponderosa pine forests: Implications for understory native and exotic plants (2006, background): “For example, lack of herbivores may increase their invasive and persistence capabilities (Carpenter & Cappuccino, 2005), and unlike many native annual and biennial species, exotics may be temporally persistent.”
Species richness of herbivores on exotic host plants increases with time since introduction of the host (2008, background): “…species richness increases with the time since introduction (time hypothesis; Southwood, 1961; reanalysed by Strong, 1974; Strong et al ., 1977; Birks, 1980; Kennedy & Southwood, 1984; Andow & Imura, 1994; Rosenzweig, 1995; Frenzel et al ., 2000; Carpenter & Cappuccino, 2005; Cripps et al ., 2006).”
ENEMY RELEASE? AN EXPERIMENT WITH CONGENERIC PLANT PAIRS AND DIVERSE ABOVE- AND BELOWGROUND ENEMIES (2005, background): “Alternatively, geographic range size may be correlated with abundance or time since introduction, indicating a buildup of enemies over space or time (Strong et al. 1984, Torchin and Mitchell 2004, Carpenter and Cappuccino 2005).”
Plant invasion across space and time: factors affecting nonindigenous species success during four stages of invasion. (2007, background): “The enemy release hypothesis (ERH) suggests that NIPS benefit from transport outside the range of their natural enemies (Elton, 1958; Maron & Vila, 2001; Keane & Crawley, 2002; Carpenter & Cappuccino, 2005).”
Release from foliar and floral fungal pathogen species does not explain the geographic spread of naturalized North American plants in Europe (2009, background): “Carpenter and Cappuccino (2005) found that the average damage by herbivores was larger on 30 native species than on 39 exotic species in Ontario.”
NO EVIDENCE FOR TRADE‐OFFS: CENTAUREA PLANTS FROM AMERICA ARE BETTER COMPETITORS AND DEFENDERS (2008, background): “…microbial interaction), the novelty of a biochemical may correlate with its superior effectiveness because new and naı̈ve neighbors would not have had the opportunity to evolve tolerance or resistance (see Cappuccino and Carpenter 2005, Carpenter and Cappuccino 2005, Cappuccino and Arnason 2006).”