Plant-soil feedbacks: a meta-analytical review.

By A. Kulmatiski, K. Beard, John R. Stevens, S. M. Cobbold. Ecology Letters, 2008

950 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Agronomy and Crop Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9b91a02ea62f4c26c99448144f337c6ab9d13b16

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Agronomy and Crop Science

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

In Plant Science

Citations in the corpus

Consequences of plant–soil feedbacks in invasion (2013, background): “Widespread evidence indicates that individual plant species can influence soil biota, which can differentially affect the performance of plant species (Ehrenfeld, Ravit & Elgersma 2005; Kulmatiski et al. 2008; Bever et al. 2010).”
Resource limitation is a driver of local adaptation in mycorrhizal symbioses (2010, background): “Plant communities influence the composition of communities of soil organisms (19), and in turn, these organisms may have beneficial, detrimental, or neutral effects on plant growth and thus, generate positive or negative feedbacks (20).”
Assessing soil quality under intensive cultivation and tree orchards in Southern Italy (2011, background): “The positive response of lettuce growth to soil sterilization, in non-inoculated plants, suggests the built-upof anegativemicrobial community in suchsoils (Mazzoleni et al., 2007; Kulmatisky et al., 2008).”
Testing predictions of the Janzen–Connell hypothesis: a meta-analysis of experimental evidence for distance- and density-dependent seed and seedling survival (2014, background): “Furthermore, a metaanalysis of plant–soil feedbacks by Kulmatiski et al. (2008), which included mostly glasshouse studies of grassland species, found strong support for the hypothesis that soil pathogens contribute to the maintenance of plant diversity through negative frequency dependence.”
Uses and misuses of meta‐analysis in plant ecology (2014, methodology): “Bayesian meta-analysis is making its first inroads into plant ecology, with the first meta-analysis using this approach published in 2008 (Kulmatiski et al. 2008) and eight more Bayesian meta-analyses published in 2009–2013.”
Inoculation with a Native Soil Community Advances Succession in a Grassland Restoration (2012, background): “Late successional species may suffer less from negative soil feedbacks and can benefit from 218 Restoration Ecology Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 218–226 MARCH 2012 an increase in mycorrhizal densities (Janos 1980; Bever 2003; Bardgett et al. 2005; Kardol et al. 2007; Kulmatiski et al. 2008).”
Conspecific plant–soil feedbacks reduce survivorship and growth of tropical tree seedlings (2010, background): “For instance, a meta-analysis by Kulmatiski et al. (2008) suggests that experiments using cultivated soils and glasshouse conditions tend to be more detrimental to plant performance than experiments using field-collected soils and field conditions.”
Crop rotational diversity increases disease suppressive capacity of soil microbiomes (2018, background): “Abiotic factors (e.g., salt, moisture, nutrients) can limit the strength and alter the direction of plant–soil feedbacks (Bever et al. 1997, Mills and Bever 1998, Packer and Clay 2000, Kulmatiski et al. 2008, Mavrodi et al. 2012).”
Facilitation and the invasibility of plant communities (2021, background): “Generally, soil biota in nonnative ranges have neutral or even positive effects on non- native invasive plants (Kulmatiski et al., 2008; Lekberg et al., 2018).”
Complex plant–soil interactions enhance plant species diversity by delaying community convergence (2013, background): “These effects, known as plant– soil feedbacks (Bever 2003; Ehrenfeld, Ravit & Elgersma 2005; Kulmatiski et al. 2008), can be positive or negative, depending on the net influence of mutualistic organisms such as mycorrhizal fungi and nitrogen-fixing bacteria and antago-*Correspondence author.”
Plant-soil biota interactions of an invasive species in its native and introduced ranges: implications for invasion success. (2013, background): “The net effect of soil biota in the native ranges of an invasive plant can be more negative than the net effect of soil biota in introduced ranges of the same species (Reinhart et al., 2003; Reinhart and Callaway, 2006; Kulmatiski et al., 2008; Callaway et al., 2011).”
Linear and non-linear impacts of a non-native plant invasion on soil microbial community structure and function (2011, background): “Nonlinear dynamics can arise from feedbacks between organisms and the environment, which are common in plant communities (Ehrenfeld et al. 2005; Kulmatiski et al. 2008) and may contribute to plant invasiveness (Klironomos 2002; Reinhart et al.”