Social cognitive career theory, conscientiousness, and work performance: A meta-analytic path analysis

190 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Social Cognitive Career Theory in a Diverse World (2017, background): “Brown, Lent, Telander, and Tramayne (2011) and Brown et al. (2008) as well as Sheu et al.”
Test of three conceptual models of influence of the big five personality traits and self-efficacy on academic performance: A meta-analytic path-analysis (2018, background): “…and experience in the models we examine, because they covary with performance (Brown et al., 2008; Judge et al., 2007; Richardson et al., 2012; Schneider & Preckel, 2017), and more capable students develop stronger self-efficacy beliefs (Brown et al., 2011; Chen et al., 2001; Robbins et al., 2004).”
Psychological capital and the startup capital–entrepreneurial success relationship (2016, background): “The theory further explains success in entrepreneurship by claiming that performance is influenced by self-efficacy and outcome expectations, which are direct or indirect results of general cognitive ability and specific skill sets (Brown et al. 2011).”
Research self-efficacy: A meta-analysis (2021, methodology): “A number of meta-analyses, some employing meta-analytic path-analysis, have been conducted for the SCCT (Brown et al., 2008, 2011; Sheu et al., 2010), and all have shown support for the paths from SE to outcome expectations, interest, goals, performance, and academic persistence.”