From Intractable Conflict Through Conflict Resolution To Reconciliation: Psychological Analysis
By D. Bar-Tal. 2000
590 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f863a2fa353ca23d5ec741580f79302daae84e5d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Social Psychology
- Eran Halperin
- James J. Gross
- D. Bar-Tal
- Amit Goldenberg
- Sabina Čehajić‐Clancy
- Ifat Maoz
- C. McCauley
- Peter T. Coleman
In Sociology and Political Science
- Eran Halperin
- D. Bar-Tal
- James J. Gross
- Daphna Canetti
- Amit Goldenberg
- Sabina Čehajić‐Clancy
- Ifat Maoz
- Peter T. Coleman
Citations in the corpus
- Intractable Conflict as an Attractor (2007, background): “…personally—or any encounter, for that matter—with the out-group or any of its members, the social transmission of information can have a profound effect on shaping one’s views and predisposing one to hostile action when an opportunity for contact with the person or group arises (see Bar-Tal, 2000).”
- Social-Psychological Interventions for Intergroup Reconciliation: An Emotion Regulation Perspective (2016, background): “Generally speaking, these psychological changes include alterations in beliefs, emotions, identity, and behavioral intentions (Bar-Tal, 2000; Kriesberg, 1998; Lederach, 1997).”
- Toward a theory of transformative entrepreneuring: Poverty reduction and conflict resolution in Rwanda's entrepreneurial coffee sector (2013, background): “disparity (Lederach, 2008), and quality of life gains within nations (Bar-Tal, 2000).”
- Characteristics of Protracted, Intractable Conflict: Toward the Development of a Metaframework-I (2003, background): “Such specific issues (resources, actions, and events) become symbols of great emotional importance through social interaction between people and through their connection to existing conflict narratives: stories that define the criteria for what is good, moral, and right in any given conflict setting”
- Exposure to Political Violence and Political Extremism (2013, background): “security and ways it should be achieved (Bar-Tal, 2013). This conflict ideology is rooted in culture and frames the meaning of an individual or national threat. In this way, the ethos of conflict is an important factor that can buffer the relationship between exposure and PTSD. Lavi and colleagues (”
- Why does fear override hope in societies engulfed by intractable conflict, as it does in the Israeli society? (2001, background): “(pp. 341, 343; emphasis in original) This is to say, in other terms, that people who live in a particular society (i.e., culture) share central societal beliefs that consist of such contents as collective memories, ideologies, goals, myths, etc. (see Bar-Tal, 2000a).”
- Sociopsychological Foundations of Intractable Conflicts (2007, background): “…prolonged intractable conflict, societies develop a particular ethos—ethos of conflict, which gives a general orientation and direction and provides a clear picture of the conflict, its goals, its conditions, requirements, and images of the in-group’s society and of the rival (Bar-Tal, 2000a).”
- Psychological Correlates of Support for Compromise: A Polling Study of Jewish-Israeli Attitudes toward Solutions to the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict (2005, background): “The emotion of fear is frequently described as central in intergroup conflict and as crucially affecting the chances of conflict resolution and reconciliation (Bar-Tal, 2001; Jarymowicz & Bar-Tal, 2002). Surprisingly, in our study fear of Palestinians was not related to support for compromise soluti”
- Nature, Rationale, and Effectiveness of Education for Coexistence (2004, background): “It is thus important to realize that the process of establishing coexistence begins at the lowest point of the negative intergroup relations ( Bar-Tal, 2000b ).”
- National Animosity and Cross-Border Alliances (2013, background): “…by the Oxford English Dictionary as “hostility of mind tending to break out into action, active hatred or enmity,” then becomes part of the parties’ societal beliefs and cultures, passed from generation to generation, be- 2013 1517Arikan and Shenkar coming a self-fulfilling reality (Bar-Tal, 2000).”