Characteristics of Protracted, Intractable Conflict: Toward the Development of a Metaframework-I

By Peter T. Coleman. 2003

245 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cdaece308cbeef17319aaecf795551ed90dd1584

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

1. Eran Halperin
2. D. Bar-Tal
3. J. Vollhardt
4. G. Salomon
5. Peter T. Coleman
6. Daphna Canetti
7. Keren Sharvit
8. A. Zafran

In Sociology and Political Science

1. D. Bar-Tal
2. J. Vollhardt
3. Eran Halperin
4. G. Salomon
5. Daphna Canetti
6. Peter T. Coleman
7. Keren Sharvit
8. A. Zafran

Citations in the corpus

• Exposure to Violence, Ethos of Conflict, and Support for Compromise (2017, background): “Long-running violent conflicts are resistant to intervention, mediation, and negotiation processes (Ayres 2000; Coleman 2003; Graf, Kramer, and Nicolescou 2010).”
• The Role of Victim Beliefs in the Israeli–Palestinian Conflict: Risk or Potential for Peace? (2009, background): “The dynamics of victim beliefs and their effects are particularly evident in the Israeli–Palestinian conflict and, in part, explain its intractability (Coleman, 2003 ; Rouhana & Bar-Tal, 1998 ).”
• Does Peace Education Make a Difference in the Context of an Intractable Conflict (2004, background): “The kind of context of interest here is the intractable (Coleman, 2003; Kriegsberg, 1993) or protracted conflict (Fisher, 1997).”
• Intractable Conflict as an Attractor (2007, background): “…They can be triggered and emerge from a wide variety of factors and events, but they often involve important issues such as moral and identity differences, highstakes resources, and/or struggles for power and self-determination (P. T. Coleman, 2003; Kriesberg, 1999; Putnam & Peterson, 2003).”
• Sociopsychological Foundations of Intractable Conflicts (2007, background): “…long-lasting, severe conflict has serious implications for the involved societies and the world community; therefore, understanding its dynamics is a special challenge for social scientists (see, for example, Azar, 1990; Coleman, 2003; Goertz & Diehl, 1993; Mitchell, 1981; Staub & Bar-Tal, 2003).”
• Dynamics of two-actor cooperation–competition conflict models (2008, background): “[1] Coleman, P.”
• Ethos of conflict: The concept and its measurement. (2012, background): “…worldwide, intractable conflicts receive the most attention because of their serious and harsh implications, first and foremost for the societies involved, and also for the international community (see Azar, 1990; Coleman, 2003; Kriesberg, 1998; Vallacher, Coleman, Nowak, & Bui-Wrzosinska, 2010).”
• Managing Intractable Identity Conflicts (2009, background): “Disidentification has a strong evaluative/ affective component (Pratt, 2000); in intractable conflicts, disidentification is expressed in strong emotions, including hatred, pride, and fear (Coleman, 2003; Putnam & Wondolleck, 2003; Sen, 2006; Wedge, 1987).”