Patterns of Representation: Dynamics of Public Preferences and Policy
By Christopher Wlezien. Journal of Politics, 2004
360 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f83150fc1725ee60ce3cf8bec7f74489f5f9e49e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- O. James
- Stuart Soroka
- Patrick Flavin
- P. John
- Christopher Wlezien
- A. Olsen
- Gregg G. Van Ryzin
- Morten Hjortskov
In Political Science and International Relations
- O. James
- P. John
- Stuart Soroka
- Patrick Flavin
- Christopher Wlezien
- George A. Boyne
- A. Olsen
- R. Erikson
Citations in the corpus
- Social democrats and the new partisan politics of public investment in education (2009, neutral): “In contrast, I argue that political parties not only act as ‘transmission belts’ for economic class interests, but try to blend ideological preferences with a sensitivity to the preferences of the electorate (Cusack 1997; see also Wlezien 1995, 2004).”
- Public Management at the Ballot Box: Performance Information and Electoral Support for Incumbent English Local Governments (2006, background): “…areas where citizen–policy performance links have been investigated, especially economic voting, research finds that many aspects of representative democracy do work in practice (Clarke et al. 2004; der Brug, van der Eijk, and Franklin 2007; Lewis-Beck and Paldam 2000; Sanders 2000; Wlezien 2004).”
- Political Institutions and the Opinion–Policy Link (2012, background): “In our previous work (Soroka and Wlezien 2004, 2005, 2010), we have argued that there is reason to think that governments in majoritarian systems are more responsive to opinion change.11 First, it is presumably easier for a single party to respond to changes than a multi-party coalition, as…”
- Income Inequality and Policy Representation in the American States (2012, background): “…distinction is whether public opinion is compared with the roll call voting behavior of individual elected officials (Achen, 1978; Bartels, 1991; Clinton, 2006; Miller & Stokes, 1963; Powell, 1982) or with public policy outcomes (Erikson et al., 1993, 2002; Page & Shapiro, 1983; Wlezien, 2004).”
- Democracy and Government Performance: Holding Incumbents Accountable in English Local Governments* (2009, background): “1282 george a. boyne et al. as a key factor in performance-based voting (Anderson 2000, 2006; Lewis-Beck and Paldam 2000; Nadeau, Niemi, and Yoshinaka 2002; Powell and Whitten 1993; Sanders 2000; Stein 1990; van der Brug, van der Eijk, and Franklin 2007; Wlezien 2004).”