Political Fact-Checking on Twitter: When Do Corrections Have an Effect?
By Drew B. Margolin, Anikó Hannák, Ingmar Weber. 2018
243 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Communication, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f7c98362292f9bb7381529dcf7a6e84605432fd9
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Communication
- Emily K. Vraga
- Leticia Bode
- Sojung Claire Kim
- John Cook
- M. Tully
- Elmie Nekmat
- S. van der Linden
- J. Roozenbeek
In Sociology and Political Science
- Emily K. Vraga
- Leticia Bode
- Sojung Claire Kim
- John Cook
- M. Tully
- Elmie Nekmat
- S. van der Linden
- J. Roozenbeek
Citations in the corpus
- Correction Experiences on Social Media During COVID-19 (2021, background): “On the other hand, they were corrected—and if that correction is effective, as some research suggests it might be (Margolin et al., 2018), their misperceptions may be lower as a result.”
- Testing the Effectiveness of Correction Placement and Type on Instagram (2020, background): “2013; Nyhan and Reifler 2010; 2015; Thorson 2016), especially in the realm of social media (Bode and Vraga, 2015; Margolin et al. 2018; Smith and Seitz 2019; Vraga and Bode 2017), although one study found that logic-focused corrections were more effective than fact-focused appeals in reducing misper”
- Creating News Literacy Messages to Enhance Expert Corrections of Misinformation on Twitter (2020, background): “…social media platforms using recommendation algorithms or flagging false stories (Bode & Vraga, 2015; Clayton et al., 2019; Pennycook & Rand, 2017), and from other users, provided that the correction comes from multiple users providing a credible source (Margolin et al., 2018; Vraga & Bode, 2018).”