Positive Education

By D. Gómez-Baya, J. Gillham. The Routledge Handbook of Positive Communication, 2019

96 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Positive education: Learning and teaching for wellbeing and academic mastery (2018, background): “…2008; Noble, Wyatt, McGrath, Roffey & Rowling, 2008; Roffey, 2012, 2016; Slemp et al., 2017; Waters, 2015; Waters, 2017; Waters et al., 2017; White, 2010, 2013; White et al., 2017), we suggest that there are six reasons for embedding positive education within educational systems:…”
SEARCH: A Meta-Framework and Review of the Field of Positive Education (2019, background): “The separation of virtue and relationships into two pathways assisted schools to build these two aspects of wellbeing in more dedicated ways (see Waters et al. 2017, for the discussion of evolving from five to six pathways).”
Levers and leverage points for pathways to sustainability (2020, background): “A ‘whole person’ approach emphasizes social and emotional capacities along with technical skills more obviously related to labour productivity (Podger, Mustakova-Possardt, & Reid, 2010; Seligman & Adler, 2018).”
Activity Achievement Emotions and Academic Performance: A Meta-analysis (2021, background): “Our findings also have further implications for recent movements in education that position student well-being as central to education, including social-emotional learning and “positive education” (Ng and Vella-Brodrick 2019; Slemp et al. 2017).”