The Attention economy

By T. Davenport, John C. Beck. UBIQ, 2001

870 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Computer Science Applications, Education, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f6eec162f006a69c719cbccfc4003ae52815f89d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computer Science Applications

In Education

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Interpreting informational cues: An explorative study on information use among prospective homebuyers (2009, neutral): “Davis and Khazanchi (2008) evaluated the impact of eWOM attributes and factors on e-commerce sales using real-world data from a multiproduct retail e-commerce firm.”
What Is Personalization? Perspectives on the Design and Implementation of Personalization in Information Systems (2006, background): “As an important social phenomenon that carries great economic value [1, 2], personalization has drawn increasing research attention from both academia and industry.”
Tourists' memories, sensory impressions and loyalty: in loco and post-visit study in Southwest Portugal (2017, neutral): “With a managerial approach, Ooi (2005) suggests that tourism mediators are facing the main challenge of competing for tourists' attention, which is a scarce resource (Davenport & Beck, 2001).”
The power of gifts: organizing social relationships in open source communities (2001, methodology): “It is important to note that our use of the concept attention differs considerably from the way it is commonly used in the context of attention economy, e.g. as attention span of an individual (Goldhaber, 1997) or ‘focused mental engagement’ (Davenport & Beck, 2001: 20).”
The New C Standard (Excerpted material) An Economic and Cultural Commentary (2008, neutral): “It has been proposed that the age we live in is attention not the information age, but the attention age.[93] Viewed in resource terms there is often significantly more information available to a person than attention resources (needed to process it).”
A Knowledge Management Success Model: Theoretical Development and Empirical Validation (2006, background): “, ROA) has not been well studied [18, 19], in part because it is difficult to empirically establish the link; there is an implicit assumption that desirable KM outcomes lead to desirable”