The New C Standard (Excerpted material) An Economic and Cultural Commentary
By Derek M. Jones. 2008
638 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9aa9eba4406a50eb28391130251c32d3ecccbaf8
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Yang Trista Cao
- Rachel Rudinger
- Benjamin Van Durme
- Hal Daumé Iii
- Sheng Zhang
- Kevin Duh
- Adam Poliak
- Yonatan Belinkov
Citations in the corpus
- Toward Gender-Inclusive Coreference Resolution (2019, unknown): “of “librarian” or some sort of probabilistic inference (Lyons, 1977), but not based on either grammatical gender (which does not exist in English) or lexical gender.”
- The GUM corpus: creating multilayer resources in the classroom (2016, unknown): “…initially introduced in the text, how they are referred back to, and what licenses and allows the resolution of their realization as pronouns, definite or indefinite NPs (see Section 4; for theoretical and typological background see Givón 1983, Lyons 1977:177-196, Grosz et al. 1995, among others).”
- Ordinal Common-sense Inference (2016, background): “…by many linguists, modality in nat-ural language is a continuous category, but speakers are able to map areas of this axis into discrete values (Lyons, 1977; Horn, 1989; de Haan, 1997) – Saur ´ ı and Pustejovsky (2009) According to Horn (1989), there are two scales of epistemic modality which…”
- Toward Gender-Inclusive Coreference Resolution: An Analysis of Gender and Bias Throughout the Machine Learning Lifecycle* (2021, background): “…that upon hearing “My cousin is a librarian”, many speakers will infer “female” for “cousin”, because of either an entailment of “librarian” or some sort of probabilistic inference (Lyons 1977), but not based on either grammatical gender (which does not exist anyway in English) or lexical gender.”
- The Pragmatics of Polarity (2004, background): “That said, the lexical semantics of antonymy and of scalar expressions in general is surprisingly complicated (cf. inter alia, Lyons 1977; Cruse 1986; Bierwisch 1989).”