A Knowledge Management Success Model: Theoretical Development and Empirical Validation

By Uday R. Kulkarni, S. Ravindran, Ronald D. Freeze. Journal of Management Information Systems, 2006

774 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Communication, Information Systems and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/00b6cd00cc8b587471b261ba6f55a3c0816dad37

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

In Communication

In Information Systems and Management

Citations in the corpus

Determinants of repurchase intention in online group-buying: The perspectives of DeLone & McLean IS success model and trust (2014, methodology): “Second, while prior literature has confirmed the influences of website quality and satisfaction with website on individuals’ behavior based on D&M model (e.g., Chen & Cheng, 2009; Kulkarni et al., 2007; Teo et al., 2009; Wu & Wang, 2006), previous views are incomplete.”
A Framework and Guidelines for Context-Specific Theorizing in Information Systems Research (2014, methodology): “…and IS success research, context-speciﬁc factors have been modeled as either antecedents of the core constructs or usage-related outcomes (e.g., Kulkarni et al. 2007, Lee and Kwon 2011, Molla and Licker 2001); or constituent dimensions of the core constructs (e.g., He and Wei 2009); or…”
An empirical investigation of employee portal success (2010, methodology): “Thus, in contrast to Kulkarni et al. (2007), who suggested that system quality also covers collaboration aspects, we treat collaboration quality as a separate success dimension: Collaboration quality, which covers the quality of an employee portal’s support of collaboration between its users.”
Determinants of Continuous Intention on Food Delivery Apps: Extending UTAUT2 with Information Quality (2019, background): “Rai, Lang, and Welker [38] and Kulkarni, Ravindran, and Freeze [39] found that information quality had significant influence on perceived usefulness.”
Success factors of knowledge management in temporary organizations (2011, methodology): “Also for the constructs in the category ICT-Systems, we used existing items in literature, our expert interviews and results of qualitative studies (Kulkarni et al. 2006/7; Chong 2006; Eppler and Sukowski, 2000; Sapsed et al. 2005; Hanisch et al. 2009).”
Measuring information systems success: models, dimensions, measures, and interrelationships (2008, background): “It would be interesting to see if this instrument is relevant to other types of IS beyond enterprise systems.”
Project success analysis framework: A knowledge-based approach in project management (2015, background): “Kulkarni et al. (2007) developed their own theory about knowledge management model on the hypothesis that a higher quality of knowledge, i.e. content of the available knowledge, has a positive influence on knowledge transfer.”
Research on information systems failures and successes: Status update and future directions (2014, background): “Requirements gathering, systems development, testing and implementation are all regular patterns of activity that underpin the creation, adoption and use of an IS (Kroenke et al. 2012).”
Does Knowledge Management really matter? Linking knowledge management practices, competitiveness and economic performance (2012, background): “Incentives of multiple types are likely to lead to best results for encouraging knowledge sharing – as well as other knowledge processes such as knowledge use (Kulkarni et al., 2007).”