Social and collaborative aspects of interaction with a service robot

By Kerstin Severinson Eklundh, Anders Green, Helge Hüttenrauch. Robotics Auton. Syst., 2003

314 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Control and Systems Engineering, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f6e445f4314d9789a10e6206c31b4531a90fade9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

In Control and Systems Engineering

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Situated Dialogue and Spatial Organization: What, Where… and Why? (2007, background): “(Severinson-Eklundh et al., 2003)), and explore its surroundings autonomously (e.”
Whose job is it anyway? a study of human-robot interaction in a collaborative task (2004, background): “Comparatively few studies are conducted in actual task conditions where the main purpose is the work rather than data collection (e.g., Breazeal, 2003; Fong, Thorpe, & Baur, 2001; Kawamura, Nilas, Muguruma, Adams, & Zhou, 2003; Kiesler & Goetz, 2002; Langle & Worn, 2001; Severinson-Eklundh, Green, ”
Human-robot interaction in rescue robotics (2004, background): “Although human interactions with robots span almost every robotic endeavor [10], [11], HRI research has been conducted primarily in six application domains: entertainment [12], [13], [14], [15] (see Breazeal in this issue), museum docents [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], personal assistants [21], [22] ”
Can robots manifest personality? : An empirical test of personality recognition, social responses, and social presence in human-robot interaction (2006, background): “In order for these social robots to function well in the above-mentioned roles, a plethora of literature has suggested that it is critical for them to have intimate and effective social interaction with humans (Breazeal, 2003; Duffy, 2003; Fong et al., 2003; Severinson-Eklundh, Green, & Huttenrauch”
An atlas of physical human-robot interaction (2008, unknown): “If the robot looks like a living creature, the mental model of its behavior may approach the mental model of humans or of pets, and there may also be unexpected social interactions [11].”
Value and reward based learning in neurorobots (2013, background): “Service robots are being designed to help humans with difficult or time-consuming tasks or help those with disabilities (Severinson-Eklundh et al., 2003).”
Social Robots for Long-Term Interaction: A Survey (2013, background): “As the study by Severinson-Eklundh et al. [64] shows, people should easily learn how to interact with the robot and have access to its internal state, for example, to understand where the robot is going and eventually how it may be able to help.”
A survey of socially interactive robots (2003, background): “In particular, personality may provide a useful affordance, giving users a way to model and understand robot behavior [144].”
How may I serve you?: a robot companion approaching a seated person in a helping context (2006, background): “They must survive and carry out tasks in a disordered and unpredictable environment, safely and effectively.”