The non-economic motives behind the willingness to pay for biodiversity conservation

By B. Martín‐López, C. Montes, J. Benayas. 2007

491 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Marketing, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f6ab0000d1798bedda43fdce725625325c0a3fa7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Marketing

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Rethinking ecosystem services to better address and navigate cultural values (2012, background): “Insofar as they have been quantified, cultural ES have generally been valued in purely economic terms (e.g., Chiesura and de Groot, 2003; Martín-López et al., 2007, 2009), which cannot reflect the full extent of their differences from other ecosystem services.”
The seven impediments in invertebrate conservation and how to overcome them (2011, background): “Existence values are related with the willingness to pay for the conservation of species and communities (Martín-López et al., 2007).”
The conservation against development paradigm in protected areas: Valuation of ecosystem services in the Doñana social-ecological system (southwestern Spain) (2011, background): “Martín-López et al. (2007b) found that more than 65% of users felt satisfaction related to conserving biodiversity and were willing to pay 36.04 € per annum for species protection.”
Relating ecoystem services to domains of human well-being: Foundation for a U.S. index (2013, background): “Biophilia is most evident by he popularity of zoos and outdoor activities and in people who ave non-economic motivations for the protection of natural areas nd biodiversity, such as positive experiences of an area, solastalgia, nd having affection or sympathy for non-human species (Serpell, 004; Mar”
Does colour matter? The influence of animal warning coloration on human emotions and willingness to protect them (2013, background): “…should be investigated how animal coloration influences the popularity of flagship species among the general public as the success of the use of conspicuously coloured animals in conservationist programs requires public support (Czech et al., 1998; Kleiman et al., 2000; Martín-López et al., 2007).”
Trade-offs across value-domains in ecosystem services assessment. (2014, methodology): “Supply of ecosystem services: a biophysical approach While the agricultural land-use in the Doñana SES has increased over the last five decades, the production of rice and vine grape has declined 32% and 35%, respectively during the 21st century.”
Human preferences for species conservation: Animal charisma trumps endangered status (2017, background): “For instance, based on hypothetical species choices and money allocation, Martín-López et al. (2007) found that affect-related factors (e.g. charisma) havemore influence onWTP than ecological or scientific considerations.”
Plants have a chance: outdoor educational programmes alter students' knowledge and attitudes towards plants (2011, background): “Attitudes are decisive in achieving conservation goals (Martin‐Lopez, Montes, and Benayas 2007 ), which suggests that building positive attitudes towards the environment would at least partly improve effectiveness of nature protection programmes (Price, Vining, and Saunders 2009 ).”
Key factors driving attitudes towards large mammals in conflict with humans (2014, background): “Compare for example, the difference between a general question such as: Do you support elephant conservation, compared to: Do you think an elephant should be culled when it is seen 100 m from your house two times a week? Not surprisingly significant differences in attitudes towards different wildlif”