Subjective well-being and the family: Results from an ordered probit model with multiple random effects

By R. Winkelmann. Social Science Research Network, 2005

146 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Gender Studies, General Health Professions, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f67fea5273c10321501d224139cfc16d1210b620

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gender Studies

1. G. Heineck
2. Christoph Wunder
3. J. van Ours
4. Alison L. Booth
5. Simona Rasciute
6. P. Downward
7. S. Selim
8. David Angrave

In General Health Professions

1. M. Sabri
2. G. Heineck
3. Simona Rasciute
4. P. Downward
5. J. van Ours
6. S. Selim
7. Christoph Wunder
8. Alison L. Booth

In Social Psychology

1. P. Downward
2. Simona Rasciute
3. M. Sabri
4. G. Heineck
5. J. van Ours
6. S. Selim
7. Christoph Wunder
8. Alison L. Booth

Citations in the corpus

• Financial well‐being of Malaysian college students (2012, background): “Past research shows that individual well-being is interdependent within a family; well-being reported by children, for example, is strongly correlated with parents’ well-being (Winkelmann, 2005).”
• Hours of Work and Gender Identity: Does Part-Time Work Make the Family Happier? (2009, unknown): “Van Praag and Ferrer-i-Carbonell (2004: Chapter 6) investigate gender differences in happiness and explore covariances between satisfaction of the two partners in a household, using random effects from a cross-section of the BHPS. Winkelmann (2004) uses the GSOEP to examine inter-dependence across gen”
• Job Satisfaction and Family Happiness: The Part-Time Work Puzzle (2008, methodology): “Winkelmann (2005) uses the GSOEP to examine inter-dependence across generations, using random effects estimation.4 In a companion paper (Booth and Van Ours, 2008),”
• Does sport make you happy? An analysis of the well‐being derived from sports participation (2011, result): “In contrast, studies by Winkelmann and Winkelmann (1998), Winkelmann (2005), Gardner and Oswald (2006) and Frijters, Johnston, and Shields (2008) measure well-being as life satisfaction.”
• Modeling Ordered Choices: A Primer and Recent Developments (2008, unknown): “A quick search of just the “ordered probit” model identified applications on: • academic grades [Butler et al. (1994), Li and Tobias (2006a)], • bond ratings [Terza (1985)], • Congressional voting on a Medicare bill [McElvey and Zavoina (1975)], • credit ratings [Cheung (1996)], • driver injury seve”
• Working Time Preferences, Hours Mismatch and Well-Being of Couples: Are There Spillovers? (2012, methodology): “…looked at utility interdependence between generations, i.e. between parents and children, and have consistently reported positive correlations of the well-being of family members (e.g., Winkelmann 2005, Powdthavee and Vignoles 10 2008, Bruhin and Winkelmann 2009, Schwarze and Winkelmann 2011).”
• Modeling Ordered Choices: A Primer (2010, unknown): “The implication is that the samples used for possibly many of the of the binary choice equations in the Das and van Soest (2000) or the Winkelmann and Winkelmann (1998) estimator will lose many observations.”
• Life Satisfaction and Happiness in Turkey (2008, methodology): “The model was used by Gerdtham and Johannesson (1997), Schwarze and Winkelmann (2005), Peasgood (2005), Winkelmann (2005) , Marks and Fleming (1999), Hartog and Oosterbeek (1998), Carbonell and Frijters (2002), Hayo and Seifert (2003) and Praag and Carbonell (2006).”