Greenhouse gases in intensive agriculture: contributions of individual gases to the radiative forcing of the atmosphere
By G. Robertson, Eldor A. Paul, R. Harwood. Science, 2000
1,445 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f666b4fac0d444ec25d4d658c51df27b87e6fa01
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Pete Smith
- Stephen Polasky
- Uwe A. Schneider
- E. Nelson
- Kris A. Johnson
- Bruce A. McCarl
- David M. Lodge
- A. Costamagna
Citations in the corpus
- Net global warming potential and greenhouse gas intensity in irrigated cropping systems in northeastern Colorado. (2006, unknown): “The soils in our study were converted from conventional moldboardplowcultivationtoNTin1999.TheNTpracticesin the Robertson et al. (2000) and Kessavalou et al. (1998) studies were instituted more than 10 and 20 yr, respectively, before the gas flux measurements while the Hutsch (1998) soils had been”
- Greenhouse Gas Fluxes in Tropical and Temperate Agriculture: The need for a Full-Cost accounting of Global Warming Potentials (2004, background): “Sources of GWP – in a maize–soybean–wheat cropping system of the US Midwest based on 9 years of measurements (Robertson et al., 2000).”
- Bioenergy and sustainable development (2007, background): “The loss of nitrogen (as nitrous oxide) from croplands also contributes significantly to GHG emissions (129, 132).”
- Agricultural opportunities to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions. (2007, result): “Climate forcing potential or global warming potential (GWP) is a function of radiative forcing (i.e., the expected effect from the addition of a unit of gas on the radiation balance of the Earth), mean lifetime (i.e., how long the forcing by a unit of gas is expected to continue) and emissions (i.e.”
- Multifunctional Agriculture in the United States (2005, methodology): “…in SOC (in metric tons per ha per year) for land uses projected under our four scenarios, using a value of 0.1 for alterative cropping (US Department of State 2000), 0.3 for conservation tillage (Robertson et al. 2000), 0.9 for pastures (Follett et al. 2001), and 2.0 for wetlands (Lal et al. 1999).”
- Ecological forecasts: an emerging imperative. (2001, background): “eutrophication in coastal fisheries and increases in atmospheric greenhouse gases (CH 4,CO2,N2O) ( Robertson et al. 2000 ).”
- Greenhouse gas mitigation in agriculture (2008, background): “When assessing the impact of agriculture on changes in GHG emissions, it is important to consider the impacts on all GHGs together (Robertson et al. 2000; Smith et al. 2001; Gregorich et al. 2005).”
- Global Impact of Biotech Crops: Socio-Economic and Environmental Effects in the First Ten Years of Commercial Use (2007, background): “…of GHG emissions from GM crops derive from two principle sources (Conservation Technology Information Center (CTIC), 2004; Fabrizzi, Morónc, & García, 2003; Jasa, 2002; Lazarus & Selley, 2005; Reicosky, 1995; Robertson et al., 2000; Johnson et al., 2005; Liebig et al., 2005; West & Post, 2002).”
- Perspective of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) containing ACC deaminase in stress agriculture (2007, background): “The heat stress in terms of so-called global warming is a serious threat to world agriculture [92, 115].”
- Optimal classification methods for mapping agricultural tillage practices (2004, background): “Enhanced carbon sequestration rates are an additional long-term benefit associated with no-till systems (Robertson et al., 2000).”