The morality of freedom

By R. Bellamy. 1988

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Philosophy

Citations in the corpus

Alignment of Language Agents (2021, background): “Some accounts claim that manipulation bypasses the receiver’s capacity for rational deliberation (Raz, 1986), but using this to define manipulation is difficult because it’s not clear what counts as bypassing rational deliberation (Noggle, 2020).”
Distributing the burdens of climate change (2008, unknown): “Egalitarianism, that is, raises the ‘levelling down problem’ (Raz 1986 , p.”
The Limits of Fungibility: Relational Schemata and the Value of Things (2003, unknown): “Drawing on both modern moral philosophy (Raz 1986) and classic sociological theory (Durkheim [1925] 1976), they argued for the explanatory usefulness of the notion of constitutive incommensurability.”
The psychology of the unthinkable: taboo trade-offs, forbidden base rates, and heretical counterfactuals. (2000, background): “The moralist-theologian framework traces opposition to reducing all values to a single utility metric to a deeper, more intractable form of incommensurability: constitutive incommensurability, a pivotal concept in modern moral philosophy (Raz, 1986) as well as in classic sociological theory (Durkhei”
Two types of ‘enough’: sufficiency as minimum and maximum (2016, background): “However, around the turn of the twenty-first century, the value of equality in distributions was challenged increasingly from within the liberal camp (e.g. Raz 1986, Frankfurt 1987, Anderson 1999, Krebs 2000, Crisp 2003).”
Learner Autonomy in EFL Studies in Vietnam: A Discussion from Sociocultural Perspective (2010, background): “Freedom, choice, and negotiation are often identified as crucial environment factors for learner autonomy development (e. g., Lamb, 2009; Raz, 1986; Sinclair, 2009).”
Perfectionism, Paternalism and Liberalism in Sen and Nussbaum's Capability Approach (2002, background): “Freedom is not the only good to promote, but one good among others (see for example Arneson, 2000, pp. 59-63; Hurka, 1993, pp. 148-9; Finnis, 1980, p. 95; Kraut, 1999, p. 325; Raz, 1986 ).”
The Development of Capability Indicators (2009, background): “Together they might be taken as relating to agency (Nussbaum and Sen, 1993), autonomy (Raz, 1986) or going further back to psychological work on achievement-motivation (McClennen, 1988), and they suggest the shared importance to men and women of life structure.”
Thinking the unthinkable: sacred values and taboo cognitions. (2003, background): “14 Raz, J. (1986) The Morality of Freedom, Clarendon Press/Oxford”
Weaving Cultural Relevance and Achievement Motivation Into Inclusive Classroom Cultures (2018, background): “CRRE scholars describe autonomous persons as those who can shape, and determine the course of, their own lives (Raz, 1986).”
The Algorithmic Leviathan: Arbitrariness, Fairness, and Opportunity in Algorithmic Decision Making Systems (2021, unknown): “…is unable to develop an adequate range of capacities (Sen 1980, 1993; Nussbaum 2011), has insufficient opportunity for genuine freedom or autonomy (Raz 1988), is among the least well-off in ways that require remediation (Rawls 1971), or is consistently excluded from opportunities in a way that…”