Perfectionism, Paternalism and Liberalism in Sen and Nussbaum's Capability Approach

By Séverine Deneulin. 2002

127 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Political Science and International Relations, Safety Research, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7c13b14717da2326cdc2a369c67341121133f558

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Political Science and International Relations

1. S. Alkire

In Safety Research

1. S. Alkire
2. Maria Emma Santos
3. Suman Seth
4. A. Brandolini
5. Rolf Aaberge
6. Yingfeng Fang
7. C. Mills

In Sociology and Political Science

1. S. Alkire
2. I. Robeyns
3. Eda Beyazıt
4. M. B. Cahill
5. Maria Emma Santos
6. Yingfeng Fang
7. Rolf Aaberge
8. A. Brandolini

Citations in the corpus

• The Capability Approach: Using the capability approach: prospective and evaluative analyses (2008, background): “…an evaluative framework whose constituent elements are the capabilities of people (individuals) is misleading [(Gore 1997; Evans 2002; Stewart and Deneulin 2002; Gasper and van Staveren 2003; Stewart 2005; Deneulin 2006) – see also (Sen 2002), and Déneulin, Dubois and Rousseau, and Derobert and…”