Spitzer View on the Evolution of Star-forming Galaxies from z = 0 to z ~ 3

By P. Pérez-González, G. Rieke, E. Egami, A. Alonso-Herrero, H. Dole, C. Papovich, M. Blaylock, J. Jones, M. Rieke, J. Rigby and 4 more. 2005

398 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We use a 24 μm-selected sample containing more than 8000 sources to study the evolution of star-forming galaxies in the redshift range from z = 0 to z ~ 3. We obtain photometric redshifts for most of the sources in our survey using a method based on empirically built templates spanning from ultraviolet to mid-infrared wavelengths. The accuracy of these redshifts is better than 10% for 80% of the sample. The derived redshift distribution of the sources detected by our survey peaks at around z = 0.6-1.0 (the location of the peak being affected by cosmic variance) and decays monotonically from z ~ 1 to z ~ 3. We have fitted infrared luminosity functions in several redshift bins in the range 0 < z ≲ 3. Our results constrain the density and/or luminosity evolution of infrared-bright star-forming galaxies. The typical infrared luminosity (L*) decreases by an order of magnitude from z ~ 2 to the present. The cosmic star formation rate (SFR) density goes as (1 + z)4.0±0.2 from z = 0 to 0.8. From z = 0.8 to z ~ 1.2, the SFR density continues rising with a smaller slope. At 1.2 < z ≲ 3, the cosmic SFR density remains roughly constant. The SFR density is dominated at low redshift (z ≲ 0.5) by galaxies that are not very luminous in the infrared (LTIR < 1011 L☉, where LTIR is the total infrared luminosity, integrated from 8 to 1000 μm). The contribution from luminous and ultraluminous infrared galaxies (LTIR > 1011 L☉) to the total SFR density increases steadily from z ~ 0 up to z ~ 2.5, forming at least half of the newly born stars by z ~ 1.5. Ultraluminous infrared galaxies (LTIR > 1012 L☉) play a rapidly increasing role for z ≳ 1.3.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f658663774209a4aca05e4ab8c9500205459655a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. P. Hopkins
  2. L. Hernquist
  3. R. Somerville
  4. R. Dav'e
  5. P. V. van Dokkum
  6. D. M. Alexander
  7. C. Conroy
  8. Thomas J. Cox

In Instrumentation

  1. P. Hopkins
  2. L. Hernquist
  3. R. Dav'e
  4. P. V. van Dokkum
  5. R. Somerville
  6. C. Conroy
  7. M. Franx
  8. Christopher J. Conselice

Citations in the corpus