The Infrared Luminosity Function of Galaxies at Redshifts z = 1 and z ~ 2 in the GOODS Fields

By K. Caputi, G. Lagache, Lin Yan, H. Dole, N. Bavouzet, É. Le Floc'h, P. Choi, G. Helou, Naveen A. Reddy. 2007

267 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We present the rest-frame 8 μm LF at redshifts z = 1 and ~2, computed from Spitzer 24 μm-selected galaxies in the GOODS fields over an area of 291 arcmin2. Using classification criteria based on X-ray data and IRAC colors, we identify the AGNs in our sample. The rest-frame 8 μm LFs for star-forming galaxies at redshifts z = 1 and ~2 have the same shape as at z ~ 0, but with a strong positive luminosity evolution. The number density of star-forming galaxies with log10(νL) > 11 increases by a factor >250 from redshift z ~ 0 to 1 and is basically the same at z = 1 and ~2. The resulting rest-frame 8 μm luminosity densities associated with star formation at z = 1 and ~2 are more than 4 and 2 times larger than at z ~ 0, respectively. We also compute the total rest-frame 8 μm LF for star-forming galaxies and AGNs at z ~ 2 and show that AGNs dominate its bright end, which is well described by a power law. Using a new calibration based on Spitzer star-forming galaxies at 0 < z < 0.6 and validated at higher redshifts through stacking analysis, we compute the bolometric IR LF for star-forming galaxies at z = 1 and ~2. We find that the respective bolometric IR luminosity densities are (1.2 ± 0.2) × 109 and (6.6) × 108 L☉ Mpc-3, in agreement with previous studies within the error bars. At z ~ 2, around 90% of the IR luminosity density associated with star formation is produced by luminous and ultraluminous IR galaxies, with the two populations contributing in roughly similar amounts. Finally, we discuss the consistency of our findings with other existing observational results on galaxy evolution.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c7c922530103170f1f0c7e519a3f5a68fa68aa1a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. P. Hopkins
  2. L. Hernquist
  3. R. Dav'e
  4. R. Somerville
  5. D. M. Alexander
  6. P. V. van Dokkum
  7. A. Dekel
  8. C. Conroy

In Instrumentation

  1. P. Hopkins
  2. L. Hernquist
  3. P. V. van Dokkum
  4. R. Dav'e
  5. C. Conroy
  6. M. Franx
  7. A. Dekel
  8. R. Somerville

Citations in the corpus