Star Formation in AEGIS Field Galaxies since z = 1.1: The Dominance of Gradually Declining Star Formation, and the Main Sequence of Star-forming Galaxies

By K. Noeske, B. Weiner, S. Faber, C. Papovich, D. Koo, R. Somerville, K. Bundy, Christopher J. Conselice, J. Newman, David Schiminovich and 33 more. 2007

966 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We analyze star formation (SF) as a function of stellar mass (M*) and redshift z in the All-Wavelength Extended Groth Strip International Survey. For 2905 field galaxies, complete to 1010(1010.8) M☉ at z < 0.7(1), with Keck spectroscopic redshifts out to z = 1.1, we compile SF rates (SFRs) from emission lines, GALEX, and Spitzer MIPS 24 μm photometry, optical-NIR M* measurements, and HST morphologies. Galaxies with reliable signs of SF form a distinct "main sequence" (MS), with a limited range of SFRs at a given M* and z (1 σ ≲ ±0.3 dex), and log(SFR) approximately proportional to log M*. The range of log(SFR) remains constant to z > 1, while the MS as a whole moves to higher SFR as z increases. The range of the SFR along the MS constrains the amplitude of episodic variations of SF and the effect of mergers on the SFR. Typical galaxies spend ~67%(95%) of their lifetime since z = 1 within a factor of ≲2(4) of their average SFR at a given M* and z. The dominant mode of the evolution of SF since z ~ 1 is apparently a gradual decline of the average SFR in most individual galaxies, not a decreasing frequency of starburst episodes, or a decreasing factor by which SFRs are enhanced in starbursts. LIRGs at z ~ 1 seem to mostly reflect the high SFR typical for massive galaxies at that epoch. The smooth MS may reflect that the same set of few physical processes governs SF prior to additional quenching processes. A gradual process like gas exhaustion may play a dominant role.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/46e1671f2c4a946af81dfc1907f7deb75391d256

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

1. P. Hopkins
2. L. Hernquist
3. R. Dav'e
4. R. Somerville
5. Volker Springel
6. A. Dekel
7. C. Conroy
8. Thomas J. Cox

In Instrumentation

1. P. Hopkins
2. L. Hernquist
3. R. Dav'e
4. R. Somerville
5. C. Conroy
6. A. Dekel
7. P. V. van Dokkum
8. Volker Springel

Citations in the corpus

• GASP. I. Gas Stripping Phenomena in Galaxies with MUSE (2017, background): “Innumerable observational evidencepoints to this, including the evolution of the passive fraction with time and the evolution of the star formation rate– stellar mass relation (e.g., Bell et al. 2004; Noeske et al. 2007).”
• THE IMPACT OF INTERACTIONS, BARS, BULGES, AND ACTIVE GALACTIC NUCLEI ON STAR FORMATION EFFICIENCY IN LOCAL MASSIVE GALAXIES (2012, background): “…France Instead, the existence of a tight relation between stellar mass and star formation rate, followed by star-forming galaxies up to at least z = 2 (e.g. Noeske et al. 2007; Salim et al. 2007; Rodighiero et al. 2010; Nordon et al. 2010; Elbaz et al. 2011), suggests that star formation is mainly…”
• Evolution of galaxy stellar masses and star formation rates in the eagle simulations (2014, background): “Observationally, a well-defined star forming sequence as a function of stellar mass has been found in the local Universe, which appears to hold up to a redshift of 3 (e.g. Noeske et al. 2007; Karim et al. 2011).”
• The STAGES view of red spirals and dusty red galaxies: Mass-dependent quenching of star formation in cluster infall (2008, background): “Given an S-SFR scatter in the blue cloud of ∼0.3 dex (Noeske et al. 2007; Salim et al. 2007), these semipassive spirals are ∼2σ outliers from the regular SF sequence in field galaxy samples (see also the discussion in Schiminovich et al. 2007).”
• Metallicity gradients in local field star-forming galaxies: insights on inflows, outflows, and the coevolution of gas, stars and metals (2015, background): “Zahid et al.(2012) empirically constrain the mass loading factor in star-forming galaxies to be less than 1 by assuming that these galaxies evolve on the measured mass-metallicity and the galaxy main-sequence (Noeske et al. 2007).”
• PHIBSS: Unified Scaling Relations of Gas Depletion Time and Molecular Gas Fractions (2017, background): “…stellar mass (M*) and star formation rate (SFR), the ‘star-formation main sequence (MS)’ (e.g. Brinchmann et al. 2004, Schiminovich et al. 2007, Noeske et al. 2007, Daddi et al. 2007, Franx et al. 2008, Elbaz et al. 2007, 2011, Rodighiero et al. 2010, 2011, Peng et al. 2010, Whitaker et al.…”
• On the impact of empirical and theoretical star formation laws on galaxy formation (2010, background): “Noeske et al. (2007), Elbaz et al. (2007) and Daddi et al. (2007) extended this work to higher redshifts, finding that the ‘main sequence’ of starforming galaxies in the SFR–”
• Supermassive black holes and their feedback effects in the IllustrisTNG simulation (2017, result): “Therefore, we leave a detailed comparison to the numerous observations in this area (e.g. Noeske et al. 2007; Rodighiero et al. 2011; Wuyts et al. 2011; Whitaker et al. 2012; Speagle et al. 2014; Renzini & Peng 2015; Schreiber et al. 2015; Tasca et al. 2015) to future work, and use the star…”
• Herschel unveils a puzzling uniformity of distant dusty galaxies (2010, background): “…that govern star formation in galaxies are poorly understood: recent evidence points to relatively steadystate growth rather than episodic, merger-driven starbursts, with a tight link between galaxy mass and star-formation rate (SFR, Noeske et al. 2007; Elbaz et al. 2007; Daddi et al. 2007).”
• Galaxies in a simulated ΛCDM Universe – I. Cold mode and hot cores (2008, background): “At all times galaxies form a well defined star forming sequence with mass, with a slope similar to the observed slope (Daddi et al. 2007; Noeske et al. 2007).”
• Molecular and atomic gas along and across the main sequence of star-forming galaxies (2016, background): “It it often parametrised as a linear relation between log M∗ and log SFR, with a slope in the range of 0.5 to 1.0 and a scatter about this relation of∼ 0.3 dex (e.g.Noeske et al. 2007; Pannella et al. 2009; Rodighiero et al. 2010).”
• The HDUV Survey: A Revised Assessment of the Relationship between UV Slope and Dust Attenuation for High-redshift Galaxies (2017, background): “IRX Versus Stellar Mass The well-studied correlations between star-formation rate and stellar mass (e.g., Noeske et al. 2007; Reddy et al. 2006b; Daddi et al. 2007; Pannella et al. 2009; Wuyts et al. 2011; Reddy et al. 2012b; Whitaker et al. 2014; Schreiber et al. 2015; Shivaei et al. 2015), and…”
• REGULARITY UNDERLYING COMPLEXITY: A REDSHIFT-INDEPENDENT DESCRIPTION OF THE CONTINUOUS VARIATION OF GALAXY-SCALE MOLECULAR GAS PROPERTIES IN THE MASS-STAR FORMATION RATE PLANE (2013, neutral): “Initially observed at low redshift (e.g., Brinchmann et al. 2004, Salim et al. 2007, Wyder et al. 2007), this “star-forming main sequence (MS)” was soon shown to be present out to z∼ 2 (Noeske et al. 2007, Elbaz et al. 2007, Daddi et al. 2007b).”
• THE RELATION BETWEEN STAR FORMATION RATE AND STELLAR MASS FOR GALAXIES AT 3.5 ⩽ z ⩽ 6.5 IN CANDELS (2014, background): “2 (Daddi et al. 2007; Noeske et al. 2007; Dunne et al. 2009; Oliver et al. 2010; Rodighiero et al. 2010), opposing results have been observed in the literature for higher redshift (z > 2) galaxies.”
• The confinement of star-forming galaxies into a main sequence through episodes of gas compaction, depletion and replenishment (2015, background): “Observations typically reveal a MS scatter of σMS ' 0.3 dex (e.g., Noeske et al. 2007a; Rodighiero et al. 2011; Whitaker et al. 2012; Schreiber et al. 2015).”
• THE MAJOR AND MINOR GALAXY MERGER RATES AT z < 1.5 (2011, background): “We know that typical blue galaxies are not evolving purely passively, but form a significant number of new stars at z < 1 (e.g. Lilly et al. 1996 ; Noeske et al. 2007).”
• ISM MASSES AND THE STAR FORMATION LAW AT Z = 1 TO 6: ALMA OBSERVATIONS OF DUST CONTINUUM IN 145 GALAXIES IN THE COSMOS SURVEY FIELD (2015, background): “INTRODUCTION For star forming galaxies there exists a Main Sequence (MS) with galaxy star formation rates (SFRs) varying nearly linearly with stellar mass (Noeske et al. 2007).”
• The Evolution of Galaxy Structure Over Cosmic Time (2014, background): “At higher redshifts z > 1 there is also a well defined relation between star formation rate and stellar mass, such that higher mass galaxies have a higher rate of star formation (e.g., Noeske et al. 2007; Bauer et al. 2011).”