Quality assessment and institutional change: Experiences from 14 countries

By J. Brennan, Tarla Shah. 2000

210 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Political Science and International Relations

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f602ab9fcdaa856dd38590a03c57d400cf9bd44c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Political Science and International Relations

Citations in the corpus

Impacts of performance-based accountability on institutional performance in the U.S. (2010, background): “Brennan and Shah (2000) categorize the new higher education initiatives as impact through rewards, changing policies or structures at the institutional level, and impact through changing cultures.”
New challenges for higher education: global and Asia-Pacific perspectives (2009, background): “This trend does not mean that the state is not involved since Government involvement occurs through indirect mechanisms, such as through funding and quality assurance agencies (e.g., Alexander 2000; Brennan and Shah 2000 ).”
Unravelling quality culture in higher education: a realist review (2017, background): “The role of external quality assessment and national legislation, for instance, has an ample influence on organisational functioning, by impacting on organisational policies, financing and perhaps even organisational cultures (Brennan and Shah 2000).”
Tertiary education for the knowledge society (2008, background): “It is argued that confidence in tertiary education can no longer be based on a combination of quality embedded in elitism and tight governmental regulation of the educational process (Brennan and Shah, 2000) (see also Chapter 5).”
International comparisons and trends in external quality assurance of higher education: Commonality or diversity? (2004, methodology): “Brennan and Shah (2000a) did not go this far, but did challenge the convergence model of van Vught and Westerheijden (1993), which they pointed out was only based on EU countries with some consideration of the US and some other frameworks.”