Auditory distraction from low‐intensity noise: a review of the consequences for learning and workplace environments

171 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A Review of Research and a Meta-Analysis of the Seductive Detail Effect. (2012, background): “Therefore, the meta-analysis did not consider studies investigating irrelevant sound or speech effects (e.g., Beaman, 2005) or the television distraction effect (Armstrong, Boiarsky, & Mares, 1991; Armstrong & Greenberg, 1990).”
The impact of the classroom built environment on student perceptions and learning (2014, background): “One such nuance is the nature of the cognitive task (Beaman, 2005), as the tasks in sound studies range from memory for word lists to reading comprehension tasks.”
Auditory Distraction in Semantic Memory: A Process-Based Approach. (2008, background): “tional to the acoustic-based effects of irrelevant speech found in serial recall (Beaman, 2005).”