Methods for Testing and Evaluating Survey Questionnaires
By S. Presser, Mick Couper, J. Lessler, E. Martín, Jean Martin, J. Rothgeb, Eleanor Singer. 2004
273 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f5bc21023d1b521b73c53bd9ace7ccfe59e0d555
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Sociology and Political Science
- Riccardo Scarpa
- Roy Brouwer
- M. Ryan
- Wiktor L. Adamowicz
- D.walaa badawy
- Roger Tourangeau
- Christian A. Vossler
- David Pooe
Citations in the corpus
- Contemporary Guidance for Stated Preference Studies (2017, background): “The survey literature documents procedures for survey pretesting (Presser et al. 2004), but specific and comprehensive guidance as to what pretest procedures should be used for SP questionnaires is rare.”
- E-mail interviewing in qualitative research: A methodological discussion (2006, unknown): “The American Psychological Association (Kraut et al., 2004), the American Association for the Advancement of Science (Frankel & Siang, 1999), the Association of Internet Research (Ess, 2002), Brownlow and O’Dell (2002), Eysenbach and Till (2001), Mann and Stewart (2000), Pittenger (2003) , and Shar”
- Measuring Left–Right Political Orientation: The Choice of Response Format (2007, background): “Previous research lends support for the latter hypothesis: Survey instruments drawing on numbers eventually reach the abilities of respondents’ to express their opinions accurately (Presser et al. 2004).”
- The relationship between employee satisfaction and organisational performance : evidence from a South African government department : original research (2013, methodology): “The adapted questionnaire was pretested using a conveniently selected sample of 20 respondents in order to identify and eliminate problems as well as to determine the time for the completion of the questionnaire (Presser et al., 2004).”
- Content validity--establishing and reporting the evidence in newly developed patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments for medical product evaluation: ISPOR PRO Good Research Practices Task Force report: part 2--assessing respondent understanding. (2011, methodology): “dent ability to use the software and hardware appropriately [19,23].”