Goals as cornerstones of subjective well-being: Linking individuals and cultures.
By S. Oishi. 2000
205 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f54c5a7ee993b315e0365770c0fe90fb7025e0c2
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Maarten Vansteenkiste
- Richard M. Ryan
- Bart Soenens
- Valery Chirkov
- Edward L. Deci
- W. Lens
- Kennon M. Sheldon
- J. Reeve
Citations in the corpus
- Development and validation of a brief form of the Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire. (2002, unknown): “The core affective trait underlying the MPQ PEM factor is well-being, a construct that has been studied extensively in relation to health and adjustment (Diener, 2000; Oishi, 2000; Seligman, 1991).”
- The importance of autonomy for rural Chinese children's motivation for learning (2009, background): “…to conclude that experiences of autonomy in collectivistic cultures will not be vitalizing (e.g., Markus & Kitayama, 2003) and may even be detrimental (e.g., Oishi, 2000) to people who are pressured to meet external expectations such as social harmony, conformity, and interpersonal relationships.”
- Self-Concordance and Subjective Well-Being in Four Cultures (2004, background): “…others should be most conducive to SWB, whereas goals undertaken to advance self-interests or achievements may actually be harmful to SWB. Similarly, Oishi (2000) has also argued that goals associated with independence and self-expression may be less beneficial within collectivist cultures than…”
- Autonomy and Relatedness in Cultural Context (2005, background): “For example, some cultural perspectives (Iyengar & Lepper, 1999: Markus & Kitayama, 1991; Oishi, 2000; Rothbaum, Pott, Azuma, Miyake, & Weise, 2000; see also Miller, 2002) have questioned the importance, even the existence, of autonomy in collectivistic cultures.”
- Autonomy and Competence in German and American University Students: A Comparative Study Based on Self-Determination Theory. (2004, background): “In cross-cultural investigations, the need for autonomy has most closely been examined because of its controversial nature (e.g., Miller, 1997; Oishi, 2000).”
- Life Goals and Well-Being: Are Extrinsic Aspirations Always Detrimental to Well-Being? (2009, unknown): “Individuals achieve and maintain their well-being mostly from the life domain on which they place greatest importance (Oishi, 2000).”
- Self-determination for all language learners: New applications for formal language education (2019, background): “While some researchers (e.g., Miller,1999; Oishi, 2000) have argued that autonomymay be a sociological construct (see Noels, Chaffee, Michalyk, andMcEown (2014) for a more recent and detailed discussion addressing culture and autonomy in language learning), originating from a Western perspective, ro”
- Cultural Context and Psychological Needs in Canada and Brazil (2005, background): “For example, Oishi (2000) argued that greater autonomy, which he equated with individualism, only yields benefits to persons inside a few highly individualistic Western nations where autonomy is valued.”
- Motivational processes in the coach‐athlete relationship: A multi‐cultural self‐determination approach (2017, unknown): “For example, Oishi (2000) argued that greater autonomy only yields bene fi ts to people inside a few highly individualistic Western nations where autonomy is valued (e.g., Sweden, Britain).”
- The Eudaimonic and Hedonic Components of Happiness: Qualitative and Quantitative Findings (2011, background): “The contents of goals and meanings can differ across societies and cultures (Christopher 1999; Oishi 2000; Grouzet et al. 2005).”
- Experiences of Autonomy and Control Among Chinese Learners: Vitalizing or Immobilizing?. (2005, background): “These findings have led a number of cross-cultural researchers to conclude that experiences of autonomy will not be vitalizing (e.g., Markus & Kitayama, 1991, 2003) or will even be detrimental to people in collectivistic cultures (e.g., Oishi, 2000).”
- General Need for Autonomy and Subjective Well-Being: A Meta-Analysis of Studies in the US and East Asia (2017, unknown): “…the advocates of the latter perspective, some researchers assume a ‘‘cultural rela-tivist’’ position on autonomy (e.g., Iyengar and Lepper 1999; Oishi 2000) and argue that autonomy is a value endorsed by Western, individualistic, liberal societies and would thus be less beneficial for people in…”
- Advances and Open Questions in the Science of Subjective Well-Being (2018, unknown): “For instance, in a large meta-analysis on the item-order effect on life satisfaction judgments, Schimmack and Oishi (2005) showed that the item-order effect like those investigated by Strack et al.”
- Differentiating autonomy from individualism and independence: a self-determination theory perspective on internalization of cultural orientations and well-being. (2003, methodology): “Oishi (2000) measured Valery Chirkov, Department of Psychology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada; Richard M. Ryan, Department of Clinical and Social Sciences in Psychology, University of Rochester; Youngmee Kim, Mount Sinai School of Medicine; Ulas Kaplan, Department of…”
- Using signature strengths in pursuit of goals: Effects on goal progress, need satisfaction, and well-being, and implications for coaching psychologists (2010, background): “This cautionary note is especially important in terms of generalising the current findings across cultures, as goals are differentially associated with well-being across cultural groups (Oishi, 2000).”
- Where (who) are collectives in collectivism? Toward conceptual clarification of individualism and collectivism. (2007, background): “Oishi, S., (2000). Goals as cornerstones of subjective well-being: Linking individuals and cultures.”