How to Detect Deception? Arresting the Beliefs of Police Officers, Prosecutors and Judges
By Leif A. Strömwall, Pär Anders Granhag. 2003
253 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f541b6c04080771bda50fb0fe049dd4fdc911d78
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
- Maria Hartwig
- Aldert Vrij
- Pär Anders Granhag
- Leanne ten Brinke
- S. Porter
- Leif A. Strömwall
- Michael G. Aamodt
- H. Custer
In Social Psychology
- Maria Hartwig
- Pär Anders Granhag
- Aldert Vrij
- Leanne ten Brinke
- S. Porter
- Leif A. Strömwall
- Michael G. Aamodt
- H. Custer
In Sociology and Political Science
- Maria Hartwig
- Pär Anders Granhag
- Leif A. Strömwall
- Leanne ten Brinke
- S. Porter
- Aldert Vrij
- Michael G. Aamodt
- H. Custer
Citations in the corpus
- Interrogating to detect deception and truth : effects of strategic use of evidence (2005, unknown): “…support for these claims; instead, research suggests the cues reported in these manuals reflect common misconceptions about the link between demeanor and deception that I discussed above (Akehurst, Köhnken, Vrij, & Bull, 1996; Strömwall & Granhag, 2003; Strömwall et al., 2004; Vrij & Semin, 1996).”
- Verbal and nonverbal behaviour as a basis for credibility attribution: The impact of task involvement and cognitive capacity (2008, unknown): “…about cues associated with deception (Akehurst, Koehnken, Vrij, & Bull, 1996; Granhag, Andersson, Strömwall, & Hartwig, 2004; Hocking & Leather, 1980; Reinhard, Burghardt, Sporer, & Bursch, 2002; Strömwall & Granhag, 2003; Vrij & Taylor, 2003; Zuckerman, Koestner, & Driver, 1981; Koehnken, 1988).”
- Imprisoned knowledge: Criminals' beliefs about deception (2004, background): “In line with previous research, we expected that students would subscribe to stereotypical beliefs about liars' behaviour often found in studies investigating subjective cues to deception (e.g. Akehurst et al., 1996; Strömwall & Granhag, 2003).”
- Why professionals fail to catch liars and how they can improve (2004, unknown): “Hence, police officers believe that there is a relationship between consistency and veracity (Akehurst Lie detection et al., 1996; Granhag & Strömwall, 1999; Greuel, 1992; Strömwall & Granhag, 2003).”
- Who can best catch a liar?: A meta-analysis of individual differences in detecting deception. (2006, background): “…professionals are likely to believe that cues such as gaze aversion are indicators of deception, when research is clear that such cues are not related to deception (Akehurst, Köhnken, Vrij, & Bull, 1996; Strömwall & Granhag, 2003; Vrij, 1993; Vrij & Semin, 1996) Is Confidence Related to Accuracy?”
- Police Officers’ Lie Detection Accuracy: Interrogating Freely Versus Observing Video (2004, result): “On the contrary, in the study investigating professionals’ beliefs about cues to deception (Strömwall & Granhag, 2003), police officers expressed the belief that nonverbal cues are more reliable than verbal ones.”
- The truth about lies: What works in detecting high‐stakes deception? (2010, background): “For example, critical thinking errors, a reliance on false stereotypes, and the influence of schemas can influence judicial decisions (e.g. Stromwall & Granhag, 2003; Vrij, 2000, 2004; Vrij & Mann, 2004).”