Police Officers’ Lie Detection Accuracy: Interrogating Freely Versus Observing Video

101 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

To act truthfully: Nonverbal behaviour and strategies during a police interrogation (2006, methodology): “The Event factor was used for purposes of analyses of the police officers deception detection accuracy (see Hartwig, Granhag, Stromwall, & Vrij, 2004 ), and was not of importance for this study.”
Who can best catch a liar?: A meta-analysis of individual differences in detecting deception. (2006, methodology): “After the individual correlation coefficients were computed, the validity coefficient for each study was weighted by the size of the sample and the coefficients combined using the method suggested by Hunter and Schmidt (1990) and Arthur et al.”
A new theoretical perspective on deception detection: On the psychology of instrumental mind-reading (2008, background): “Remember Dupin’s critique that the reasoning of the Parisian police only adverted to ‘the modes in which they would have hidden [the letter]’.”