The truth about lies: What works in detecting high‐stakes deception?

By S. Porter, Leanne ten Brinke. 2010

222 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d49e89dba1bdede3af070eefface39f45e97d2cf

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Maria Hartwig
2. C. F. Bond
3. Aldert Vrij
4. Pär Anders Granhag
5. R. Fisher
6. Jeffrey T. Hancock

In Social Psychology

1. Maria Hartwig
2. C. F. Bond
3. Aldert Vrij
4. Pär Anders Granhag
5. R. Fisher
6. Jeffrey T. Hancock

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Maria Hartwig
2. C. F. Bond
3. Aldert Vrij
4. Jeffrey T. Hancock
5. Pär Anders Granhag

Citations in the corpus

• Lie Detection from Multiple Cues: A Meta‐analysis (2014, background): “In a discussion of high-stake lies, Porter and ten Brinke (2010) suggested that high-stake lies might manifest themselves qualitatively rather than quantitatively different.”
• Dangerous decisions: the impact of first impressions of trustworthiness on the evaluation of legal evidence and defendant culpability (2010, unknown): “DePaulo et al, 2003 ; Porter & ten Brinke, in press ; Vrij, 2008 ).”