Do Foreign and Domestic Venture Capital Firms Differ in Their Monitoring of Investees?

112 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Managing knowledge in foreign entry strategies: a resource-based analysis (2009, background): “Local knowledge and networks are especially important for businesses that intensively interact with customers during delivery (Malhotra, 2003; Pruthi, Wright, and Lockett, 2003 ).”
What Drives New Ventures to Internationalize from Emerging to Developed Economies? (2007, background): “Pruthi, Wright, and Lockett (2003) find that DE-based VC firms active in EE spend more time and effort on customer and supplier introductions and on assisting with marketing plans than they do on investments in DE.”
Guest Editors' Introduction Strategy Research in Emerging Economies: Challenging the Conventional Wisdom* (2005, unknown): “However, Pruthi et al. (2003) adopt a mixed AT and IT perspective to examine the monitoring approaches adopted by foreign and domestic venture capital firms (VCs) in India.”
The impact of venture capital financing method on SME performance and internationalization (2011, background): “Lockett et al. 2008; Barney et al. 2001; Pruthi et al. 2003; and George et al. 2005).”
Attracting cross-border venture capital: the role of a local investor (2008, background): “Although prior comparative research suggests that venture capitalists operate quite similarly in different countries (Sapienza et al. 1996, Manigart et al. 2002, 2006), there certainly may be some country-specific differences in their behaviour (Wright et al. 2002, Pruthi et al. 2003).”