Neuroimaging evidence for dissociable forms of repetition priming.

By Richard N. Henson, T. Shallice, R. J. Dolan. Science, 2000

659 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f46b73e07df1a9a9f4d02844c03789fb5f82dfa1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Selective neural representation of objects relevant for navigation (2004, background): “Alternatively, the decrease could reflect previously reported repetition-related changes in object representation”
Detecting Latency Differences in Event-Related BOLD Responses: Application to Words versus Nonwords and Initial versus Repeated Face Presentations (2002, background): “Stimulus repetition tends to decrease decision times in such " implicit " memory tasks, which makes these data interesting in the context of repetition priming (Henson et al., 2000).”
Pharmacological Modulation of Behavioral and Neuronal Correlates of Repetition Priming (2001, background): “Because repetition suppression can be sensitive to lag (Henson et al., 2000), it may be that weaker repetition suppression with longer lags is more sensitive to drug influences.”
Divide and conquer: A defense of functional localizers (2006, background): “Greater power allows researchers to investigate with confidence the relatively subtle aspects of a region's response profile, such as those revealed in fMRI adaptation studies (Grill-Spector and Malach, 2001; Henson et al., 2000; see also Fig.”
Free-energy and the brain (2007, background): “This can be seen in many contexts, ranging from the mismatch negativity in EEG research (Näätänen, 2003) to fMRI examples of face processing (see Henson et al, 2000 and Figure 6).”
Contextual factors multiplex to control multisensory processes (2016, background): “…avenue to pursue in future research, given recent evidence for the interplay between stimulus repetition and factors such as expectancy, attention, and memory [e.g., Doehrmann et al., 2010; Henson et al., 2000; Recasens et al. 2014; Turk-Browne et al., 2007; reviewed in Segaert et al., 2013].”
Linking implicit and explicit memory: common encoding factors and shared representations. (2006, background): “For example, it has been demonstrated that when completely novel stimuli are repeated, explicit recognition is associated with enhancement in ventral visual areas, rather than attenuation (Henson et al., 2000).”
Repetition suppression versus enhancement--it's quantity that matters. (2013, background): “For example, Henson et al. (2000) showed that with every repetition of a formerly unfamiliar face, the blood oxygen level--dependent (BOLD) response in the fusiform face area increased—even when the face was repeated up to 5 times.”
Neuroimaging studies of priming. (2003, background): “Henson et al. (2000) offered an explanation of their results in terms of both modification of pre-existing representations (for familiar stimuli), associated with repetition suppression, and acquisition of new representations (for unfamiliar stimuli), associated with repetition enhancement.”
Orbitofrontal cortex tracks positive mood in mothers viewing pictures of their newborn infants (2004, positive): “Included in this activated cluster was the fusiform area as observed for the scan comparing familiar and unfamiliar adults, consistent with some previous reports (Henson et al., 2000) but not others (Leveroni et al.”