Detecting Latency Differences in Event-Related BOLD Responses: Application to Words versus Nonwords and Initial versus Repeated Face Presentations

By Richard N. Henson, Cathy J. Price, Michael D. Rugg, Robert Turner, Karl J. Friston. NeuroImage, 2002

378 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d665df7d3c2d56a0d707e9268a7aed748007ef50

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

Citations in the corpus

Body mass correlates inversely with inhibitory control in response to food among adolescent girls: An fMRI study (2010, neutral): “We also included temporal derivatives of the hemodynamic function to obtain a better model of the data (Henson et al., 2002).”
Variation of BOLD hemodynamic responses across subjects and brain regions and their effects on statistical analyses (2004, methodology): “Brain Mapp., 20 (2) (2003), pp. 116-121 以下の研究を拡張して領域間の HRFの変動を証明． [16]G.K. Aguirre, E. Zarahn, et al. The variability of human, BOLD hemodynamic responses NeuroImage, 8 (4) (1998), pp. 360-369 [17]F.M. Miezin, L. Maccotta, et al. Characterizing the hemodynamic response: effects of presentation rate,”
Neural responses to ingroup and outgroup members' suffering predict individual differences in costly helping. (2010, positive): “Regressors of interest weremodeled using a canonical hemodynamic response function (HRF) with time derivative, the latter accounting for subject-to-subject and voxel-to-voxel variation in the response peak (Henson et al., 2002).”
The multisensory function of the human primary visual cortex. (2016, background): “One proposition is that an earlier peak reflects facilitated neural processing time (Henson et al., 2002; see Wang et al. (2008) for initial findings of facilitated responses latencies to multisensory stimuli in the monkey primary visual cortex).”
A critical role for the right fronto-insular cortex in switching between central-executive and default-mode networks (2008, methodology): “(7) revealed that the rFIC and ACC had earlier peak latency compared to other regions in the CEN and DMN (data not shown).”
Slice-timing effects and their correction in functional MRI (2011, background): “Furthermore, we know that temporal derivatives can explain variance due to temporal delays of about ±1s (Henson et al., 2002).”
Specificity of Action Representations in the Lateral Occipitotemporal Cortex (2006, methodology): “This necessitated using a slightly different formula from the one provided by Henson et al. (2002) to calculate the time to peak of the response.”
A visual analytics approach to understanding cycling behaviour (2012, neutral): “A bottom clause is the most speciﬁc clause (with most literals) that can be considered as a candidate hypothesis.”
Spontaneous brain activity and EEG microstates. A novel EEG/fMRI analysis approach to explore resting-state networks (2010, background): “On the other hand, microstates above 25% of the total EEG duration are accompanied by the problem of “fast event related design” leading to BOLD saturation and hence have low power (Henson et al., 2002).”
Modeling the Hemodynamic Response Function in fMRI: Efficiency, Bias and Mis-modeling (2008, methodology): “As might be expected, the derivative models and related methods (e.g., Liao et al., 2002; Henson et al., 2002) may be quite accurate for very short shifts in latency (< 1 s) but become progressively less accurate as the shift increases.”
The respiration response function: The temporal dynamics of fMRI signal fluctuations related to changes in respiration (2008, background): “Such a large temporal shift cannot be accomplished by simply including the derivative of the ideal response as another regressor (Henson et al., 2002).”
Incidental effects of emotional valence in single word processing: An fMRI study (2005, result): “These areas correspond closely to those reported in other recent fMRI studies of lexical decision tasks indicating involvement of neural networks responsible for processing semantic word knowledge (Binder et al., 2003; Fiebach et al., 2002; Henson et al., 2002).”