Brokerage Professions and Implementing Reform in an Age of Experts

By Katherine C. Kellogg. 2014

158 citations recorded by the source corpus.

In this comparative ethnographic case study of the implementation of a reform related to the Affordable Care Act in two community health centers, I find that professionals may not compete to claim new tasks (and thereby not implement reform) if these tasks require them to acquire information unrelated to their professional expertise, use work practices that conflict with their professional identity, or do impure or low-value tasks that threaten their professional interests. In such cases, reform may be implemented if lower-status workers fill in the gaps in the division of labor between the professions targeted by the reform, playing a brokerage role by protecting each profession’s information, meanings, and tasks in everyday work. When the new tasks represent professionally ill-defined problems, brokers can be more effective if they use buffering practices rather than connecting practices—managing information rather than transferring it, matching meanings rather than translating them, and maintaining interests rather than transforming them—to accomplish reform. By playing a buffering role in the interstices between existing professional jurisdictions, lower-status workers can carve out their own jurisdiction, becoming a brokerage profession between existing professions that need to collaborate with one another for reform to occur.

Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Public Administration

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f422a7a708231ed3c034a8a26e6f2bc1e08e7068

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

In Public Administration

Citations in the corpus

Harvesting Value from Brokerage: Individual Strategic Orientation, Structural Holes, and Performance (2017, background): “…structural characteristic of individuals’ positions in the network, but also a set of behaviors throughwhich individuals mobilize the resources accessed through ties and pursue the structural opportunities afforded by their network position (Bensaou, Galunic, & JonczykSédès, 2014; Kellogg, 2014).”
Algorithms at Work: The New Contested Terrain of Control (2020, background): “…to traditional brokerage work, algorithmic brokerage involves two main sets of practices — connecting practices and buffering practices — to bridge different groups with disparate expertise, meanings, and status (Barley, 1996; Burt, 1992; Kellogg, 2014; Lingo & O ’ Mahony, 2010; Obstfeld, 2005).”
Change above the Glass Ceiling: Corporate Social Responsibility and Gender Diversity in Japanese Firms (2018, background): “In addition, our study contributes to a growing body of work on how professional groups shape and implement organizational change (Edelman, Fuller, and Mara-Drita, 2001; Dobbin and Kelly, 2007; Briscoe and Murphy, 2012; Kellogg, 2014).”